Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimal hand washing technique to minimize bacterial contamination before neuraxial anesthesia: a randomized control trial.
Siddiqui, N; Friedman, Z; McGeer, A; Yousefzadeh, A; Carvalho, J C; Davies, S.
Afiliación
  • Siddiqui N; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: naveed.siddiqui@uhn.ca.
  • Friedman Z; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • McGeer A; Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Yousefzadeh A; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Carvalho JC; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Davies S; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Int J Obstet Anesth ; 29: 39-44, 2017 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28341129
INTRODUCTION: Infectious complications related to neuraxial anesthesia may result in adverse outcomes. There are no best practice guidelines regarding hand-sanitizing measures specifically for these procedures. The objective of this study was to compare the growth of microbial organisms on the operator's forearm between five common techniques of hand washing for labor epidurals. METHODS: In this single blind randomized controlled trial, all anesthesiologists performing labor epidurals in a tertiary care hospital were randomized into five study groups: hand washing with alcohol gel only up to elbows (Group A); hand washing with soap up to elbows, sterile towel to dry, followed by alcohol gel (Group B); hand washing with soap up to elbows, non-sterile towel to dry, followed by alcohol gel (Group C); hand washing with soap up to elbows, non-sterile towel to dry (Group D) or hand washing with soap up to elbows, sterile towel to dry (Group E). The number of colonies for each specimen/rate per 100 specimens on one or both arms per group was measured. RESULTS: The incidence of colonization was 2.5, 23.0, 18.5, 114.5, and 53.0 in Groups A, B, C, D and E, respectively. Compared to Group A, the odds ratio of bacterial growth for Group B was 1.52 (P=0.519), Group C 5.44 (P=0.003), Group D 13.82 (P<0.001), and Group E 8.65 (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Alcohol-based antiseptic solutions are superior in terms of reducing the incidence of colonization. The results will enable us to develop guidelines to standardize and improve hand-sanitizing practices among epidural practitioners.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Desinfección de las Manos / Infección Hospitalaria / Carga Bacteriana / Anestesia Epidural / Anestesia Obstétrica / Antiinfecciosos Locales Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Int J Obstet Anesth Asunto de la revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Desinfección de las Manos / Infección Hospitalaria / Carga Bacteriana / Anestesia Epidural / Anestesia Obstétrica / Antiinfecciosos Locales Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Int J Obstet Anesth Asunto de la revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos