Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Afatinib versus gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: overall survival data from the phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial.
Paz-Ares, L; Tan, E-H; O'Byrne, K; Zhang, L; Hirsh, V; Boyer, M; Yang, J C-H; Mok, T; Lee, K H; Lu, S; Shi, Y; Lee, D H; Laskin, J; Kim, D-W; Laurie, S A; Kölbeck, K; Fan, J; Dodd, N; Märten, A; Park, K.
Afiliación
  • Paz-Ares L; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Universidad Complutense and CNIO, Madrid, Spain.
  • Tan EH; Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore.
  • O'Byrne K; Cancer Section, Princess Alexandra Hospital and Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Zhang L; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
  • Hirsh V; Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
  • Boyer M; Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, Australia.
  • Yang JC; Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Mok T; Department of Clinical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of South China, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Lee KH; Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Chungbuk, South Korea.
  • Lu S; Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai.
  • Shi Y; Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Lee DH; Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Laskin J; Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Kim DW; Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Laurie SA; Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Kölbeck K; Pulmonary Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Fan J; Clinical Program Leader, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Ridgefield, USA.
  • Dodd N; Biostatistics, Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd UK, Bracknell, UK.
  • Märten A; TA Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany.
  • Park K; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ann Oncol ; 28(2): 270-277, 2017 02 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28426106
ABSTRACT

Background:

In LUX-Lung 7, the irreversible ErbB family blocker, afatinib, significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and objective response rate (ORR) versus gefitinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we present primary analysis of mature overall survival (OS) data. Patients and

methods:

LUX-Lung 7 assessed afatinib 40 mg/day versus gefitinib 250 mg/day in treatment-naïve patients with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC and a common EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion/L858R). Primary OS analysis was planned after ∼213 OS events and ≥32-month follow-up. OS was analysed by a Cox proportional hazards model, stratified by EGFR mutation type and baseline brain metastases.

Results:

Two-hundred and twenty-six OS events had occurred at the data cut-off (8 April 2016). After a median follow-up of 42.6 months, median OS (afatinib versus gefitinib) was 27.9 versus 24.5 months [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66‒1.12, P = 0.2580]. Prespecified subgroup analyses showed similar OS trends (afatinib versus gefitinib) in patients with exon 19 deletion (30.7 versus 26.4 months; HR, 0.83, 95% CI 0.58‒1.17, P = 0.2841) and L858R (25.0 versus 21.2 months; HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.62‒1.36, P = 0.6585) mutations. Most patients (afatinib, 72.6%; gefitinib, 76.8%) had at least one subsequent systemic anti-cancer treatment following discontinuation of afatinib/gefitinib; 20 (13.7%) and 23 (15.2%) patients received a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Updated PFS (independent review), TTF and ORR data were significantly improved with afatinib.

Conclusion:

In LUX-Lung 7, there was no significant difference in OS with afatinib versus gefitinib. Updated PFS (independent review), TTF and ORR data were significantly improved with afatinib. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01466660.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Quinazolinas / Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas / Neoplasias Pulmonares / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Quinazolinas / Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas / Neoplasias Pulmonares / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España