Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An Assessment of the Accuracy of Home Blood Pressure Monitors When Used in Device Owners.
Ringrose, Jennifer S; Polley, Gina; McLean, Donna; Thompson, Ann; Morales, Fraulein; Padwal, Raj.
Afiliación
  • Ringrose JS; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Polley G; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • McLean D; Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Thompson A; Faculty of Nursing, MacEwan University, Edmonton, Alberta Canada.
  • Morales F; Mazankowski Heart Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Padwal R; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Am J Hypertens ; 30(7): 683-689, 2017 Jul 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28430848
OBJECTIVE: To examine the accuracy of home blood pressure (BP) devices, on their owners, compared to auscultatory reference standard BP measurements. METHODS: Eighty-five consecutive consenting subjects ≥18 years of age, who owned an oscillometric home BP device (wrist or upper-arm device), with BP levels between 80-220/50-120 mm Hg, and with arm circumferences between 25-43 cm were studied. Pregnancy and atrial fibrillation were exclusion criteria. Device measurements from each subject's home BP device were compared to simultaneous 2-observer auscultation using a mercury sphygmomanometer. Between-group mean comparisons were conducted using paired t-tests. The proportion of patients with device-to-auscultatory differences of ≥5, 10, and 15 mm Hg were tabulated and predictors of systolic and diastolic BP differences were identified using linear regression. RESULTS: Mean age was 66.4 ± 11.0 years, mean arm circumference was 32.7 ± 3.7 cm, 54% were female and 78% had hypertension. Mean BPs were 125.7 ± 14.0/73.9 ± 10.4 mm Hg for home BP devices vs. 129.0 ± 14.7/72.9 ± 9.3 for auscultation (difference of -3.3 ± 7.3/0.9 ± 6.1; P values <0.0001 for systolic and 0.17 for diastolic). The proportion of devices with systolic or diastolic BP differences from auscultation of ≥5, 10, and 15 mm Hg was 69%, 29%, and 7%, respectively. Increasing arm circumference was a statistically significant predictor of higher systolic (parameter estimate 0.61 per cm increase; P value 0.004) and diastolic (0.38; 0.03) BP. CONCLUSIONS: Although mean differences from 2-observer auscultation were acceptable, when tested on their owners, most home BP devices were not accurate to within 5 mm Hg. Ensuring acceptable accuracy of the device-owner pairing should be prioritized.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Presión Sanguínea / Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial / Hipertensión Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Hypertens Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Presión Sanguínea / Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial / Hipertensión Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Hypertens Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos