Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Advance Care Planning Communication: Oncology Patients and Providers Voice their Perspectives.
Bires, Jennifer L; Franklin, Elizabeth F; Nichols, Helen M; Cagle, John G.
Afiliación
  • Bires JL; The George Washington University Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA. jbires@mfa.gwu.edu.
  • Franklin EF; The George Washington University Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Nichols HM; University of Maryland School of Social Work, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Cagle JG; University of Maryland School of Social Work, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Cancer Educ ; 33(5): 1140-1147, 2018 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28456948
ABSTRACT
Advance care planning helps to ensure that patients' end-of-life preferences are understood and discussed with providers. It is an important component of patient-centered care, particularly when patients are facing life-limiting illness. It also has ethical implications for providers, yet evidence suggests that these conversations are not always occurring, particularly in underserved populations. The aim of this study was to understand the challenges and personal beliefs regarding ACP through interviews with patients undergoing active cancer treatment and their oncology providers. This study took place at an urban, multispecialty cancer center in the mid-Atlantic region where approximately 1400 patients are treated each year. Findings revealed differences among both patients and providers in terms of their ACP knowledge, preferences, and practices. Overall, 70% of patients were familiar with advance directives (100% of White patients and 45.5% of Black patients), yet only 35% of them reported having completed one (55.6% of White patients and 18.2% of Black patients, although not statistically significant). Most providers (70%) held ACP conversations with patients with advanced illness only. They tended to make assumptions about the amount of information that patients desired and noted the significant challenges that were inherent with these types of conversations. Overall, ethical implications are inherent in ACP as patients are making medical decisions without always having necessary information. There are various reasons why providers may not supply information regarding potential outcomes and end-of-life planning and why patients may not request (or know to request) more medical information.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidadores / Toma de Decisiones / Planificación Anticipada de Atención / Prioridad del Paciente / Comunicación en Salud / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Educ Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidadores / Toma de Decisiones / Planificación Anticipada de Atención / Prioridad del Paciente / Comunicación en Salud / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Educ Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM