Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors Related to Implementation and Reach of a Pragmatic Multisite Trial: The My Own Health Report (MOHR) Study.
Balasubramanian, Bijal A; Heurtin-Roberts, Suzanne; Krasny, Sarah; Rohweder, Catherine L; Fair, Kayla; Olmos-Ochoa, Tanya T; Stange, Kurt C; Gorin, Sherri Sheinfeld.
Afiliación
  • Balasubramanian BA; From the Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Dallas (BAB); the Implementation Science Team, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville MD (
  • Heurtin-Roberts S; From the Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Dallas (BAB); the Implementation Science Team, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville MD (
  • Krasny S; From the Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Dallas (BAB); the Implementation Science Team, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville MD (
  • Rohweder CL; From the Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Dallas (BAB); the Implementation Science Team, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville MD (
  • Fair K; From the Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Dallas (BAB); the Implementation Science Team, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville MD (
  • Olmos-Ochoa TT; From the Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Dallas (BAB); the Implementation Science Team, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville MD (
  • Stange KC; From the Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Dallas (BAB); the Implementation Science Team, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville MD (
  • Gorin SS; From the Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Dallas (BAB); the Implementation Science Team, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville MD (
J Am Board Fam Med ; 30(3): 337-349, 2017.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28484066
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Contextual factors relevant to translating healthcare improvement interventions to different settings are rarely collected systematically. This study articulates a prospective method for assessing and describing contextual factors related to implementation and patient reach of a pragmatic trial in primary care.

METHODS:

In a qualitative case-series, contextual factors were assessed from the My Own Health Report (MOHR) study, focused on systematic health risk assessments and goal setting for unhealthy behaviors and behavioral health in nine primary care practices. Practice staff interviews and observations, guided by a context template were conducted prospectively at three time points. Patient reach was calculated as percentage of patients completing MOHR of those who were offered MOHR and themes describing contextual factors were summarized through an iterative, data immersion process.These included practice members' motivations towards MOHR, practice staff capacity for implementation, practice information system capacity, external resources to support quality improvement, community linkages, and implementation strategy fit with patient populations.

CONCLUSIONS:

Systematically assessing contextual factors prospectively throughout implementation of quality improvement initiatives helps translation to other health care settings. Knowledge of contextual factors is essential for scaling up of effective interventions.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Proyectos de Investigación / Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto / Mejoramiento de la Calidad / Ensayos Clínicos Pragmáticos como Asunto / Promoción de la Salud Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Am Board Fam Med Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Proyectos de Investigación / Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto / Mejoramiento de la Calidad / Ensayos Clínicos Pragmáticos como Asunto / Promoción de la Salud Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Am Board Fam Med Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article