Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Utilization of Intravenous Catheters by Prehospital Providers during Pediatric Transports.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 22(1): 50-57, 2018.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28792258
INTRODUCTION: Prehospital intravenous (IV) access in children may be difficult and time-consuming. Emergency Medical Service (EMS) protocols often dictate IV placement; however, some IV catheters may not be needed. The scene and transport time associated with attempting IV access in children is unknown. The objective of this study is to examine differences in scene and transport times associated with prehospital IV catheter attempt and utilization patterns of these catheters during pediatric prehospital encounters. METHODS: Three non-blinded investigators abstracted EMS and hospital records of children 0-18 years of age transported by EMS to a pediatric emergency department (ED). We compared patients in which prehospital IV access was attempted to those with no documented attempt. Our primary outcome was scene time. Secondary outcomes include utilization of the IV catheter in the prehospital and ED settings and a determination of whether the catheter was indicated based on a priori established criteria (prehospital IV medication administration, hypotension, GCS < 13, and ICU admission). RESULTS: We reviewed 1,138 records, 545 meeting inclusion criteria. IV catheter placement was attempted in 27% (n = 149) with success in 77% (n = 111). There was no difference in the presence of hypotension or median GCS between groups. Mean scene time (12.5 vs. 11.8 minutes) and transport time (16.9 vs. 14.6 minutes) were similar. Prehospital IV medications were given in 38.7% (43/111). One patient received a prehospital IV medication with no alternative route of administration. Among patients with a prehospital IV attempt, 31% (46/149) received IV medications in the ED and 23% (34/396) received IV fluids in the ED. Mean time to use of the IV in the ED was 70 minutes after arrival. Patients with prehospital IV attempt were more likely to receive IV medication within 30 minutes of ED arrival (39.1% vs. 19.0%, p = 0.04). Overall, 34.2% of IV attempts were indicated. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital IV catheter placement in children is not associated with an increase in scene or transport time. Prehospital IV catheters were used in approximately one-third of patients. Further study is needed to determine which children may benefit most from IV access in the prehospital setting.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cateterismo Periférico / Transporte de Pacientes / Servicios Médicos de Urgencia / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Implementation_research Límite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: Prehosp Emerg Care Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cateterismo Periférico / Transporte de Pacientes / Servicios Médicos de Urgencia / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Implementation_research Límite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: Prehosp Emerg Care Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido