Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Getting back on track: a systematic review of the outcomes of remediation and rehabilitation programmes for healthcare professionals with performance concerns.
Weenink, Jan-Willem; Kool, Rudolf B; Bartels, Ronald H; Westert, Gert P.
Afiliación
  • Weenink JW; Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  • Kool RB; Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Bartels RH; Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  • Westert GP; Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 26(12): 1004-1014, 2017 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28794242
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To provide an overview of the evidence regarding outcomes of remediation and rehabilitation programmes for healthcare professionals with performance concerns, and to explore if outcomes differ for specific concerns and professions.

METHODS:

A search in four databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL) was conducted from 1 January 1990 to 7 May 2017. Studies reporting on outcomes of nationwide and state-wide programmes aimed at remediation and rehabilitating healthcare professionals with performance concerns (ie, dentists, midwives, nurses, pharmacists, physicians, physiotherapists, psychologists and psychotherapists) were included.

RESULTS:

We included a total of 38 studies. More than half of the studies included programmes in the USA (57.9%), and a majority of studies focused on outcomes for physicians (78.9%) and on outcomes for substance use disorders (SUDs, 63.2%). Programme completion rates for SUDs were positive and approximately 80%-90% of participants were employed after treatment. Studies that reported on remediation outcomes for dyscompetence, almost all from Canada (7/8), showed varying results. One study compared outcomes for performance concerns in the same programme (ie, SUD and other mental and behavioural problems) and showed comparably successful results. No study specifically compared outcomes between professions.

CONCLUSION:

The literature is dominated by outcomes for physicians in North American programmes, with positive outcomes for SUD and varying outcomes for dyscompetence. Based on our findings we cannot make valid comparisons in outcomes between professions and specific performance concerns, and we call for other programmes to report on outcomes for different professions and concerns. Because of the positive outcomes of physician health programmes, other countries should consider introducing similar programmes to support healthcare professionals getting back on track.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Rendimiento Laboral / Trastornos Mentales / Servicios de Salud del Trabajador Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Qual Saf Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Rendimiento Laboral / Trastornos Mentales / Servicios de Salud del Trabajador Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Qual Saf Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos