Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold in daily clinical practice: A single-centre experience.
Remkes, W S; Hermanides, R S; Kennedy, M W; Fabris, E; Kaplan, E; Ottervanger, J P; van 't Hof, A W J; Kedhi, E.
Afiliación
  • Remkes WS; Isala Hartcentrum, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
  • Hermanides RS; Isala Hartcentrum, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
  • Kennedy MW; Isala Hartcentrum, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
  • Fabris E; Isala Hartcentrum, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
  • Kaplan E; Isala Hartcentrum, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
  • Ottervanger JP; Isala Hartcentrum, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
  • van 't Hof AWJ; Isala Hartcentrum, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
  • Kedhi E; Isala Hartcentrum, Zwolle, The Netherlands. e.kedhi@isala.nl.
Neth Heart J ; 25(11): 611-617, 2017 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28913627
BACKGROUND: Recent evidence has raised concerns regarding the safety of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (E-BVS) (Absorb, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Following these data, the use of this device has diminished in the Netherlands; however, daily practice data are limited. Therefore we studied the incidence of safety and efficacy outcomes with this device in daily clinical practice in a single large tertiary centre in the Netherlands. METHODS: All E­BVS treated patients were included in this analysis. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel non-fatal myocardial infarction (TV-MI) and clinically-driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR). The secondary endpoint was the incidence of definite scaffold thrombosis. RESULTS: Between October 2013 and January 2017, 105 patients were treated with 147 E­BVS. This population contained 42 (40%) patients with diabetes mellitus and 43 (40.9%) undergoing treatment for acute coronary syndrome, and thus represents a high-risk patient cohort. Mean follow-up was 19.8 months. Intravascular imaging guidance during scaffold implantation was used in 64/105 (43.5%) patients. The primary endpoint (TLF) occurred in 3 (2.9%) patients. All-cause mortality and cardiac mortality occurred in 2 (2%) and 0 (0%) patients respectively. TV-MI occurred in 2 patients (1.9%): both were periprocedural and not related to the BVS implantation. TLR occurred in 1 patient (1.0%) during follow-up. No definite scaffold thrombosis occurred during follow-up. CONCLUSION: This single-centre study examining the real-world experience of E­BVS implantation in a high-risk population shows excellent procedural safety and long-term clinical outcomes.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Neth Heart J Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Neth Heart J Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Países Bajos