Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bronchoprotective effect of deep inspirations in cough variant asthma: A distinguishing feature in the spectrum of airway disease?
Wasilewski, Nastasia V; Fisher, Thomas; Turcotte, Scott E; Fisher, John T; Lougheed, M Diane.
Afiliación
  • Wasilewski NV; Department of Medicine, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Fisher T; Department of Medicine, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Turcotte SE; Department of Medicine, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Fisher JT; Department of Medicine, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  • Lougheed MD; Department of Medicine, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. Electronic address: mdl@queensu.ca.
Respir Physiol Neurobiol ; 257: 55-64, 2018 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28917529
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To assess the effect of deep inspirations (DIs) on airway behaviour in individuals with classic asthma (CA), cough variant asthma (CVA), and methacholine (MCh)-induced cough but normal airway sensitivity (COUGH) during bronchoprovocation.

METHODS:

Twenty-five adults (18 female; 44.8 ±â€¯12.3 years (Mean ±â€¯SD); n = 9 CA, n = 9 CVA, and n = 7 COUGH) completed two single-dose MCh challenges, with and without DIs. Bronchoprotection was assessed by comparing changes in bronchoconstriction (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, FEF50, FEF25-75), gas trapping (RV, RV/TLC) and impulse oscillometry (IOS) measurements.

RESULTS:

The% changes in FEV1 with and without DIs were not significantly different within any group. Decreases in FEF50 and FEF25-75 were greater in CA (p = 0.041 and p = 0.029), decreases in FVC (% predicted) and FEV1/FVC(%) were less in CVA (p = 0.048 and p = 0.010), and increases in RV (L) and RV/TLC (% predicted) were less in COUGH (p = 0.007 and p = 0.028), respectively. No differences in IOS measurements were noted.

CONCLUSIONS:

DIs triggered bronchoconstriction in CA, bronchoprotection in CVA, and prevented gas trapping in COUGH.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Inhalación / Tos Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Respir Physiol Neurobiol Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Inhalación / Tos Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Respir Physiol Neurobiol Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá