Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Semi-field assessment of the BG-Malaria trap for monitoring the African malaria vector, Anopheles arabiensis.
Batista, Elis P A; Ngowo, Halfan S; Opiyo, Mercy; Shubis, Gasper K; Meza, Felician C; Okumu, Fredros O; Eiras, Alvaro E.
Afiliación
  • Batista EPA; Laboratório de Ecologia Química de Insetos Vetores, Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
  • Ngowo HS; Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
  • Opiyo M; Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
  • Shubis GK; Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
  • Meza FC; Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
  • Okumu FO; Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
  • Eiras AE; Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
PLoS One ; 12(10): e0186696, 2017.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29045484
Odour-baited technologies are increasingly considered for effective monitoring of mosquito populations and for the evaluation of vector control interventions. The BG-Malaria trap (BGM), which is an upside-down variant of the widely used BG-Sentinel trap (BGS), has been demonstrated to be effective to sample the Brazilian malaria vector, Anopheles darlingi. We evaluated the BGM as an improved method for sampling the African malaria vectors, Anopheles arabiensis. Experiments were conducted inside a large semi-field cage to compare trapping efficiencies of BGM and BGS traps, both baited with the synthetic attractant, Ifakara blend, supplemented with CO2. We then compared BGMs baited with either of four synthetic mosquito lures, Ifakara blend, Mbita blend, BG-lure or CO2, and an unbaited BGM. Lastly, we compared BGMs baited with the Ifakara blend dispensed via either nylon strips, BG cartridges (attractant-infused microcapsules encased in cylindrical plastic cartridge) or BG sachets (attractant-infused microcapsules encased in plastic sachets). All tests were conducted between 6P.M. and 7A.M., with 200-600 laboratory-reared An. arabiensis released nightly in the test chamber. The median number of An. arabiensis caught by the BGM per night was 83, IQR:(73.5-97.75), demonstrating clear superiority over BGS (median catch = 32.5 (25.25-37.5)). Compared to unbaited controls, BGMs baited with Mbita blend caught most mosquitoes (45 (29.5-70.25)), followed by BGMs baited with CO2 (42.5 (27.5-64)), Ifakara blend (31 (9.25-41.25)) and BG lure (16 (4-22)). BGM caught 51 (29.5-72.25) mosquitoes/night, when the attractants were dispensed using BG-Cartridges, compared to BG-Sachet (29.5 (24.75-40.5)), and nylon strips (27 (19.25-38.25)), in all cases being significantly superior to unbaited controls (p < 000.1). The findings demonstrate potential of the BGM as a sampling tool for African malaria vectors over the standard BGS trap. Its efficacy can be optimized by selecting appropriate odour baits and odour-dispensing systems.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Control de Mosquitos / Insectos Vectores / Malaria / Anopheles Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Control de Mosquitos / Insectos Vectores / Malaria / Anopheles Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos