Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Close and Positive Margins in Transoral Laser Microsurgery for Tis-T2 Glottic Cancer.
Fiz, Ivana; Mazzola, Francesco; Fiz, Francesco; Marchi, Filippo; Filauro, Marta; Paderno, Alberto; Parrinello, Giampiero; Piazza, Cesare; Peretti, Giorgio.
Afiliación
  • Fiz I; Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
  • Mazzola F; Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Fiz F; Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
  • Marchi F; Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Radiology, Uni-Klinikum Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Filauro M; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
  • Paderno A; Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
  • Parrinello G; Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
  • Piazza C; Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
  • Peretti G; Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Front Oncol ; 7: 245, 2017.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29085805
INTRODUCTION: Transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) represents one of the most effective treatment strategies for Tis-T2 glottic squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). The prognostic influence of close/positive margins is still debated, and the role of narrow band imaging (NBI) in their intraoperative definition is still to be validated on large cohort of patients. This study analyzed the influence of margin status on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). METHODS: We retrospectively studied 507 cases of pTis-T1b (Group A) and 127 cases of pT2 (Group B) glottic SCC. We identified the following margin status: negative (n = 232), close superficial (n = 79), close deep (CD) (n = 35), positive single superficial (n = 146), positive multiple superficial (n = 94), and positive deep (n = 48) and analyzed their impact on RFS and DSS. Close margins were defined by tumor-margin distance <1 mm. Pre-TLM margins were defined by white light in 323 patients, whereas NBI was employed in 311 patients. RESULTS: In Group A, DSS and RFS were reduced in positive multiple superficial and positive deep margins (DSS = 96.1 and 97%, both p < 0.05; RFS = 72%, p < 0.001 and 75.8%, p < 0.01). In Group B, DSS was reduced in positive multiple superficial margins (82.4%, p < 0.05). RFS was reduced in positive single superficial, positive multiple superficial, and positive deep margins (62.5, 41.2, and 53.3%, p < 0.01). In the entire population, RFS was reduced in CD margins (77.1%, p < 0.05). Use of NBI led to improvement in RFS and DSS. CONCLUSION: The study indicates that close and positive single superficial margins do not affect DSS. By contrast, all types of margin positivity predict the occurrence of relapses, albeit with different likelihood, depending on stage/margin type. CD margins should be considered as a single risk factor. Use of NBI granted better intraoperative margins definition.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia Pais de publicación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia Pais de publicación: Suiza