Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intrapersonal and interpersonal evaluation of upper extremity kinematics.
Linkel, Arturas; Raudonyte, Inga; Shippen, James; May, Barbara; Daunoraviciene, Kristina; Sawicki, Aleksander; Griskevicius, Julius.
Afiliación
  • Linkel A; Department of Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanics, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
  • Raudonyte I; Department of PM&R, Faculty of Medicine, University of Vilnius, Vilnius, Lithuania.
  • Shippen J; Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
  • May B; Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
  • Daunoraviciene K; Department of Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanics, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
  • Sawicki A; Department of Theoretical Electrotechnics and Metrology, Bialystok University of Technology, Bialystok, Poland.
  • Griskevicius J; Department of Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanics, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Technol Health Care ; 25(5): 939-948, 2017 Oct 23.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29103062
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The quality of upper extremity (UE) function can be evaluated by measuring the kinematic parameters of patient movements.

OBJECTIVE:

This investigation focused on finding the angles and angular velocity amplitudes of UE motions in healthy participants to compare with the experimental results of patients with a UE disability who are trying to recover previous movement conditions.

METHODS:

The UE motions of 23 healthy adult volunteers were tested using a three-dimensional motion capture system and measuring hand segment motions. A simplified 7 degrees of freedom (DOF) human arm kinematic model created within MATLAB and used to process the experimental data.

RESULTS:

The interpersonal CV (coefficients of variability) of left-side motions showed that the lowest CV of linear velocity amplitudes was at elbow flexion (4.2%), but the highest was at wrist extension (48.3%). The lowest and highest CV of angular velocity amplitudes were 19.6% and 55.7%, during shoulder adduction and wrist extension, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

High interpersonal CV may restrict the direct comparison of kinematic parameters of UE in different healthy and disabled persons.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fenómenos Biomecánicos / Rango del Movimiento Articular / Voluntarios Sanos / Mano Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Technol Health Care Asunto de la revista: ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Lituania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fenómenos Biomecánicos / Rango del Movimiento Articular / Voluntarios Sanos / Mano Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Technol Health Care Asunto de la revista: ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Lituania