Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Margin Assessment in Renal Surgery Using a Handheld Optical Coherence Tomography Probe.
Ludwig, Wesley W; Wobker, Sara E; Ball, Mark W; Zysk, Adam M; Yemul, Kiran S; Pierorazio, Philip M; Gorin, Michael A; Allaf, Mohamad E.
Afiliación
  • Ludwig WW; The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: wludwig1@jhmi.edu.
  • Wobker SE; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Ball MW; The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Zysk AM; Diagnostic Photonics Inc, Chicago, IL.
  • Yemul KS; Diagnostic Photonics Inc, Chicago, IL.
  • Pierorazio PM; The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Gorin MA; The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Allaf ME; The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Urology ; 113: 241-245, 2018 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29196067
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the use of a handheld optical coherence tomography (OCT) probe for the evaluation of intraoperative surgical margins during partial nephrectomy (PN).

METHODS:

In an initial feasibility study, a radical nephrectomy specimen with a 9-cm tumor was cut into 19 sections, exposing 0 mm (n = 8), 1 mm (n = 6), and 2 mm (n = 5) gross margins. OCT was used to determine the margin width in each specimen. Second, a prospective ex vivo assessment of 15 PN tumor specimens was performed with OCT to determine margin status and to measure the attenuation coefficient of tumor and renal parenchyma.

RESULTS:

Median OCT margin width measurements for sectioned samples were 0 mm, 0.9 mm (range 0.7-2.9 mm), and 2.7 (range 1.65-2.8 mm) for grossly 0 mm (positive), 1 mm, and 2 mm margins, respectively. The difference between measurements from all margin groups was statistically significant (P <.04). The sensitivity and specificity for identifying positive margins were both 100%. In the PN specimens, OCT correctly found that all specimens had negative margins (within <.0001).

CONCLUSION:

We have demonstrated the feasibility of using a handheld OCT probe to assess margins ex vivo during PN. OCT may reduce the need for intraoperative frozen section and aid in minimizing parenchymal excision.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Carcinoma de Células Renales / Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica / Márgenes de Escisión / Neoplasias Renales / Nefrectomía Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Urology Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Carcinoma de Células Renales / Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica / Márgenes de Escisión / Neoplasias Renales / Nefrectomía Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Urology Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article