Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antibiotic Prophylaxis and DAIR Treatment in Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty, A National Survey in The Netherlands.
Veltman, Ewout S; Moojen, Dirk Jan F; Nelissen, Rob Ghh; Poolman, Rudolf W.
Afiliación
  • Veltman ES; Department of orthopaedic surgery, Joint Research, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Moojen DJF; Department of orthopaedic surgery, Joint Research, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Nelissen RG; Department of orthopaedic surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, the Netherlands.
  • Poolman RW; Department of orthopaedic surgery, Joint Research, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Bone Jt Infect ; 3(1): 5-9, 2018.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29291158
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To prevent postoperative infection the use of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis is common ground. Type of antibiotic used and duration of prophylaxis are subject to debate. In case of suspected early periprosthetic infection a debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedure is treatment of first choice. This study evaluated the antibiotic prophylaxis and DAIR treatment protocols nationwide as well as reporting of these DAIR procedures to the national joint registry.

METHODS:

All institutions that performed total hip or knee arthroplasty were contacted to complete a 16-question online survey. Questions included availability of a protocol, type and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis used and tendency to register infectious complications in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.

RESULTS:

All ninety-nine consulted institutions responded to this survey. All but one institutions have a standardized hospital based protocol for antibiotic prophylaxis in primary total hip or knee arthroplasty. Cefazolin was antibiotic prophylaxis of choice in ninety-four institutions for both primary hip and knee arthroplasty. In ten institutions one preoperative gift of antibiotic prophylaxis was administered. A protocol describing treatment when suspecting early periprosthetic joint infection was present in seventy-one institutions. When performing a DAIR procedure modular parts were exchanged in seventy institutions in case of a hip prosthesis and in eighty-one institutions in case of a knee prosthesis. Sixty-three institutions register DAIR procedures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.

INTERPRETATION:

In contradiction to the results of a recent study in Great Britain, we have found only little variety in availability of protocols and in the type of antibiotic used as prophylaxis in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in The Netherlands. Not every institution has a protocol for treatment in suspicion of early infection. Although mobile parts are exchanged in the majority of cases, there appears to be an underreporting of DAIR procedures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Bone Jt Infect Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Bone Jt Infect Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos