Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pain in severe dementia: A comparison of a fine-grained assessment approach to an observational checklist designed for clinical settings.
Hadjistavropoulos, T; Browne, M E; Prkachin, K M; Taati, B; Ashraf, A; Mihailidis, A.
Afiliación
  • Hadjistavropoulos T; Department of Psychology, University of Regina, SK, Canada.
  • Browne ME; Centre on Aging and Health, University of Regina, SK, Canada.
  • Prkachin KM; AGE-WELL NCE Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Taati B; Department of Psychology, University of Regina, SK, Canada.
  • Ashraf A; AGE-WELL NCE Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Mihailidis A; AGE-WELL NCE Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada.
Eur J Pain ; 22(5): 915-925, 2018 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29359875
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Fine-grained observational approaches to pain assessment (e.g. the Facial Action Coding System; FACS) are used to evaluate pain in individuals with and without dementia. These approaches are difficult to utilize in clinical settings as they require specialized training and equipment. Easy-to-use observational approaches (e.g. the Pain Assessment Checklist for Limited Ability to Communicate-II; PACSLAC-II) have been developed for clinical settings. Our goal was to compare a FACS-based fine-grained system to the PACSLAC-II in differentiating painful from non-painful states in older adults with and without dementia.

METHOD:

We video-recorded older long-term care residents with dementia and older adult outpatients without dementia, during a quiet baseline condition and while they took part in a physiotherapy examination designed to identify painful areas. Videos were coded using pain-related behaviours from the FACS and the PACSLAC-II.

RESULTS:

Both tools differentiated between painful and non-painful states, but the PACSLAC-II accounted for more variance than the FACS-based approach. Participants with dementia scored higher on the PACSLAC-II than participants without dementia.

CONCLUSION:

The results suggest that easy-to-use observational approaches for clinical settings are valid and that there may not be any clinically important advantages to using more resource-intensive coding approaches based on FACS. We acknowledge, as a limitation of our study, that we used as baseline a quiet condition that did not involve significant patient movement. In contrast, our pain condition involved systematic patient movement. Future research should be aimed at replicating our results using a baseline condition that involves non-painful movements.

SIGNIFICANCE:

Examining older adults with and without dementia, a brief observational clinical approach was found to be valid and accounted for more variance in differentiating pain-related and non-pain-related states than did a detailed time-consuming fine-grained approach.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor / Dimensión del Dolor / Demencia Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Pain Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor / Dimensión del Dolor / Demencia Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Pain Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá
...