Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characterizing Potentially Preventable Cancer- and Chronic Disease-Related Emergency Department Use in the Year After Treatment Initiation: A Regional Study.
Panattoni, Laura; Fedorenko, Catherine; Greenwood-Hickman, Mikael Anne; Kreizenbeck, Karma; Walker, Julia R; Martins, Renato; Eaton, Keith D; Rieke, John W; Conklin, Ted; Smith, Bruce; Lyman, Gary; Ramsey, Scott D.
Afiliación
  • Panattoni L; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Cambia Health Solutions, Seattle; MultiCare Regional Cancer Center, Tacoma; and Premera Blue Cross, Mountlake Terrace, WA.
  • Fedorenko C; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Cambia Health Solutions, Seattle; MultiCare Regional Cancer Center, Tacoma; and Premera Blue Cross, Mountlake Terrace, WA.
  • Greenwood-Hickman MA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Cambia Health Solutions, Seattle; MultiCare Regional Cancer Center, Tacoma; and Premera Blue Cross, Mountlake Terrace, WA.
  • Kreizenbeck K; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Cambia Health Solutions, Seattle; MultiCare Regional Cancer Center, Tacoma; and Premera Blue Cross, Mountlake Terrace, WA.
  • Walker JR; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Cambia Health Solutions, Seattle; MultiCare Regional Cancer Center, Tacoma; and Premera Blue Cross, Mountlake Terrace, WA.
  • Martins R; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Cambia Health Solutions, Seattle; MultiCare Regional Cancer Center, Tacoma; and Premera Blue Cross, Mountlake Terrace, WA.
  • Eaton KD; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Cambia Health Solutions, Seattle; MultiCare Regional Cancer Center, Tacoma; and Premera Blue Cross, Mountlake Terrace, WA.
  • Rieke JW; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Cambia Health Solutions, Seattle; MultiCare Regional Cancer Center, Tacoma; and Premera Blue Cross, Mountlake Terrace, WA.
  • Conklin T; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Cambia Health Solutions, Seattle; MultiCare Regional Cancer Center, Tacoma; and Premera Blue Cross, Mountlake Terrace, WA.
  • Smith B; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Cambia Health Solutions, Seattle; MultiCare Regional Cancer Center, Tacoma; and Premera Blue Cross, Mountlake Terrace, WA.
  • Lyman G; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Cambia Health Solutions, Seattle; MultiCare Regional Cancer Center, Tacoma; and Premera Blue Cross, Mountlake Terrace, WA.
  • Ramsey SD; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance; Cambia Health Solutions, Seattle; MultiCare Regional Cancer Center, Tacoma; and Premera Blue Cross, Mountlake Terrace, WA.
J Oncol Pract ; 14(3): e176-e185, 2018 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29452549
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

As new quality metrics and interventions for potentially preventable emergency department (ED) visits are implemented, we sought to compare methods for evaluating the prevalence and costs of potentially preventable ED visits that were related to cancer and chronic disease among a commercially insured oncology population in the year after treatment initiation.

METHODS:

We linked SEER records in western Washington from 2011 to 2016 with claims from two commercial insurers. The study included patients who were diagnosed with a solid tumor and tracked ED utilization for 1 year after the start of chemotherapy or radiation. Cancer symptoms from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services metric and a patient-reported outcome intervention were labeled potentially preventable (PpCancer). Prevention Quality Indicators of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality were labeled potentially preventable-chronic disease (PpChronic). We reported the primary diagnosis, all diagnosis field coding (1 to 10), and 2016 adjusted reimbursements.

RESULTS:

Of 5,853 eligible patients, 27% had at least one ED visit, which yielded 2,400 total visits. Using primary diagnosis coding, 49.8% of ED visits had a PpCancer diagnosis, whereas 3.2% had a PpChronic diagnosis. Considering all diagnosis fields, 45.0%, 9.4%, and 18.5% included a PpCancer only, a PpChronic only, and both a PpCancer and a PpChronic diagnosis, respectively. The median reimbursement per visit was $735 (interquartile ratio, $194 to $1,549).

CONCLUSION:

The prevalence of potentially preventable ED visits was generally high, but varied depending on the diagnosis code fields and the group of codes considered. Future research is needed to understand the complex landscape of potentially preventable ED visits and measures to improve value in cancer care delivery.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad Crónica / Servicios Médicos de Urgencia / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Oncol Pract Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad Crónica / Servicios Médicos de Urgencia / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Oncol Pract Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article