Cost comparison of centralized and decentralized wastewater management systems using optimization model.

ABSTRACT

There is a growing interest in decentralized wastewater management (DWWM) as a potential alternative to centralized wastewater management (CWWM) in developing countries. However, the comparative cost of CWWM and DWWM is not well understood. In this study, the cost of cluster-type DWWM is simulated and compared to the cost of CWWM in Alibag, India. A three-step model is built to simulate a broad range of potential DWWM configurations with varying number and layout of cluster subsystems. The considered DWWM scheme consists of cluster subsystems, that each uses simplified sewer and DEWATS (Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems). We consider CWWM that uses conventional sewer and an activated sludge plant. The results show that the cost of DWWM can vary significantly with the number and layout of the comprising cluster subsystems. The cost of DWWM increased nonlinearly with increasing number of comprising clusters, mainly due to the loss in the economies of scale for DEWATS. For configurations with the same number of comprising cluster subsystems, the cost of DWWM varied by ±5% around the mean, depending on the layout of the cluster subsystems. In comparison to CWWM, DWWM was of lower cost than CWWM when configured with fewer than 16 clusters in Alibag, with significantly less operation and maintenance requirement, but with higher capital and land requirement for construction. The study demonstrates that cluster-type DWWM using simplified sewer and DEWATS may be a cost-competitive alternative to CWWM, when carefully configured to lower the cost.