Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Scandinavian SSAI clinical practice guideline on choice of inotropic agent for patients with acute circulatory failure.
Møller, M H; Granholm, A; Junttila, E; Haney, M; Oscarsson-Tibblin, A; Haavind, A; Laake, J H; Wilkman, E; Sverrisson, K Ö; Perner, A.
Afiliación
  • Møller MH; Department of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Granholm A; Department of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Junttila E; Department of Anaesthesiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
  • Haney M; Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
  • Oscarsson-Tibblin A; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Medicine and Health, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Haavind A; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
  • Laake JH; Division of Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Wilkman E; Division of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Perioperative, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Sverrisson KÖ; Department of Anesthesia & Critical Care, Landspitali University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
  • Perner A; Department of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 62(4): 420-450, 2018 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29479665
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Adult critically ill patients often suffer from acute circulatory failure and those with low cardiac output may be treated with inotropic agents. The aim of this Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine guideline was to present patient-important treatment recommendations on this topic.

METHODS:

This guideline was developed according to GRADE. We assessed the following subpopulations of patients with shock (1) shock in general, (2) septic shock, (3) cardiogenic shock, (4) hypovolemic shock, (5) shock after cardiac surgery, and (6) other types of shock, including vasodilatory shock. We assessed patient-important outcome measures, including mortality and serious adverse reactions.

RESULTS:

For all patients, we suggest against the routine use of any inotropic agent, including dobutamine, as compared to placebo/no treatment (very low quality of evidence). For patients with shock in general, and in those with septic and other types of shock, we suggest using dobutamine rather than levosimendan or epinephrine (very low quality of evidence). For patients with cardiogenic shock and in those with shock after cardiac surgery, we suggest using dobutamine rather than milrinone (very low quality of evidence). For the other clinical questions, we refrained from giving any recommendations or suggestions.

CONCLUSIONS:

We suggest against the routine use of any inotropic agent in adult patients with shock. If used, we suggest using dobutamine rather than other inotropic agents for the majority of patients, however, the quality of evidence was very low, implying high uncertainty on the balance between the benefits and harms of inotropic agents.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Choque / Cardiotónicos / Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto / Anestesiología Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Choque / Cardiotónicos / Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto / Anestesiología Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca