Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Making the Case: The Importance of Using 10 Key Preconception Indicators in Understanding the Health of Women of Reproductive Age.
Kroelinger, Charlan D; Okoroh, Ekwutosi M; Boulet, Sheree L; Olson, Christine K; Robbins, Cheryl L.
Afiliación
  • Kroelinger CD; Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia .
  • Okoroh EM; Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia .
  • Boulet SL; Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia .
  • Olson CK; Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia .
  • Robbins CL; Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia .
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 27(6): 739-743, 2018 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29630430
In 2006, the Preconception Care (PCC) Work Group and the Select Panel on PCC published 10 recommendations promoting preconception health (PCH) and healthcare for women of reproductive age. In the years following the recommendations, much research focused on specific PCH behaviors, clinical provision of care, and care financing, but no comprehensive, well-defined set of indicators was identified. In 2011, seven states developed a set of 45 PCH indicators; however, to date, no one publication has assessed the usefulness of all 45 indicators in addressing PCH. This report makes the case for reducing the original 45 indicators to a condensed set of 10 for national and state reporting by describing the use of the 45 indicators to date, describing development of evaluation criteria for narrowing the number of indicators, and identifying gaps in indicator development for provision of PCC. Using the condensed set, states can set priorities, revise and develop programs and policies, implement system changes, and better allocate resources to support interventions to improve the health of women of reproductive age during the preconception and interconception periods.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud / Estado de Salud / Indicadores de Salud / Atención Preconceptiva / Salud Reproductiva Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Patient_preference Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / SAUDE DA MULHER Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Georgia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud / Estado de Salud / Indicadores de Salud / Atención Preconceptiva / Salud Reproductiva Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Patient_preference Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / SAUDE DA MULHER Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Georgia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos