Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of possible criteria for elective single embryo transfer.
Sato, Wataru; Fukuda, Jun; Kanamori, Kyoko; Kawamura, Kazuhiro; Kumagai, Jin; Kodama, Hideya; Tanaka, Toshinobu.
Afiliación
  • Sato W; Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine Akita University Graduate School of Medicine 1-1-1 Hondo 010-8543 Akita Akita Japan.
  • Fukuda J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Akita City Hospital Akita Japan.
  • Kanamori K; Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine Akita University Graduate School of Medicine 1-1-1 Hondo 010-8543 Akita Akita Japan.
  • Kawamura K; Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine Akita University Graduate School of Medicine 1-1-1 Hondo 010-8543 Akita Akita Japan.
  • Kumagai J; Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine Akita University Graduate School of Medicine 1-1-1 Hondo 010-8543 Akita Akita Japan.
  • Kodama H; Akita University Graduate School of Health Sciences Akita Japan.
  • Tanaka T; Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine Akita University Graduate School of Medicine 1-1-1 Hondo 010-8543 Akita Akita Japan.
Reprod Med Biol ; 9(2): 107-113, 2010 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29662427
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

A major problem of assisted reproductive technology (ART) is multiple gestation, which impacts neonatal and perinatal medicine. The literature contains a number of reports that elective single embryo transfer (eSET) is effective for the control of multiple pregnancies; however, to date, uniform criteria have not been established.

Methods:

Using logistic regression analysis based on the results of ART in our department from January 2005 to July 2006, our eSET criteria were established. We conducted a comparative study of the clinical pregnancy rate, multiple gestation rate, and delivery rate before and after eSET (before-eSET and after-eSET groups, respectively).

Results:

As a result of the analysis, our eSET criteria included all three of the following (A) patient age ≤37, (B) previous IVF/ICSI trials ≤5, and (C) acquisition of two or more good-quality embryos. Based on our criteria, the after-eSET group was not found to have a decrease in the pregnancy rate; however, the multiple gestation rate decreased as compared to the before-eSET group. In addition, as a result of various evaluations of the eSET group, interesting findings were revealed.

Conclusions:

In the after-eSET group, our eSET criteria achieved a decrease in the multiple pregnancy rate without a decrease in the pregnancy rate.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Reprod Med Biol Año: 2010 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Reprod Med Biol Año: 2010 Tipo del documento: Article