Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Worldwide Experience with Erosion of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device.
Alicuben, Evan T; Bell, Reginald C W; Jobe, Blair A; Buckley, F P; Daniel Smith, C; Graybeal, Casey J; Lipham, John C.
Afiliación
  • Alicuben ET; Department of Surgery, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo St. #514, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
  • Bell RCW; SurgOne Foregut Institute, Englewood, CO, USA.
  • Jobe BA; Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Buckley FP; Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Daniel Smith C; Foregut & Reflux Surgery, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas-Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
  • Graybeal CJ; Esophageal Institute of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Lipham JC; The Heartburn and Swallowing Center, Northeast Georgia Physicians Group, Gainesville, GA, USA.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 22(8): 1442-1447, 2018 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29667094
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The magnetic sphincter augmentation device continues to become a more common antireflux surgical option with low complication rates. Erosion into the esophagus is an important complication to recognize and is reported to occur at very low incidences (0.1-0.15%). Characterization of this complication remains limited. We aim to describe the worldwide experience with erosion of the magnetic sphincter augmentation device including presentation, techniques for removal, and possible risk factors. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We reviewed data obtained from the device manufacturer Torax Medical, Inc., as well as the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. The study period was from February 2007 through July 2017 and included all devices placed worldwide.

RESULTS:

In total, 9453 devices were placed and there were 29 reported cases of erosions. The median time to presentation of an erosion was 26 months with most occurring between 1 and 4 years after placement. The risk of erosion was 0.3% at 4 years after device implantation. Most patients experienced new-onset dysphagia prompting evaluation. Devices were successfully removed in all patients most commonly via an endoscopic removal of the eroded portion followed by a delayed laparoscopic removal of the remaining beads. At a median follow-up of 58 days post-removal, there were no complications and 24 patients have returned to baseline. Four patients reported ongoing mild dysphagia.

CONCLUSIONS:

Erosion of the LINX device is an important but rare complication to recognize that has been safely managed via minimally invasive approaches without long-term consequences.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prótesis e Implantes / Trastornos de Deglución / Reflujo Gastroesofágico / Esfínter Esofágico Inferior / Imanes Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gastrointest Surg Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prótesis e Implantes / Trastornos de Deglución / Reflujo Gastroesofágico / Esfínter Esofágico Inferior / Imanes Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gastrointest Surg Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA