Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Home treatment of COPD exacerbation selected by DECAF score: a non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.
Echevarria, Carlos; Gray, Joanne; Hartley, Tom; Steer, John; Miller, Jonathan; Simpson, A John; Gibson, G John; Bourke, Stephen C.
Afiliación
  • Echevarria C; Respiratory Department, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK.
  • Gray J; ICM, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
  • Hartley T; Nursing, Midwifery and Health Department, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
  • Steer J; Respiratory Department, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK.
  • Miller J; ICM, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
  • Simpson AJ; Respiratory Department, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK.
  • Gibson GJ; ICM, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
  • Bourke SC; Respiratory Department, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK.
Thorax ; 73(8): 713-722, 2018 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29680821
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Previous models of Hospital at Home (HAH) for COPD exacerbation (ECOPD) were limited by the lack of a reliable prognostic score to guide patient selection. Approximately 50% of hospitalised patients have a low mortality risk by DECAF, thus are potentially suitable.

METHODS:

In a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial, 118 patients admitted with a low-risk ECOPD (DECAF 0 or 1) were recruited to HAH or usual care (UC). The primary outcome was health and social costs at 90 days.

RESULTS:

Mean 90-day costs were £1016 lower in HAH, but the one-sided 95% CI crossed the non-inferiority limit of £150 (CI -2343 to 312). Savings were primarily due to reduced hospital bed days HAH=1 (IQR 1-7), UC=5 (IQR 2-12) (P=0.001). Length of stay during the index admission in UC was only 3 days, which was 2 days shorter than expected. Based on quality-adjusted life years, the probability of HAH being cost-effective was 90%. There was one death within 90 days in each arm, readmission rates were similar and 90% of patients preferred HAH for subsequent ECOPD.

CONCLUSION:

HAH selected by low-risk DECAF score was safe, clinically effective, cost-effective, and preferred by most patients. Compared with earlier models, selection is simpler and approximately twice as many patients are eligible. The introduction of DECAF was associated with a fall in UC length of stay without adverse outcome, supporting use of DECAF to direct early discharge. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Registered prospectively ISRCTN29082260.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica / Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Thorax Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica / Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Thorax Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido