Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and efficacy of self-expanding metal stents for biliary drainage in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer.
Ballard, Darren D; Rahman, Syed; Ginnebaugh, Brian; Khan, Abdul; Dua, Kulwinder S.
Afiliación
  • Ballard DD; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.
  • Rahman S; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.
  • Ginnebaugh B; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.
  • Khan A; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.
  • Dua KS; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.
Endosc Int Open ; 6(6): E714-E721, 2018 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29868636
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND STUDY

AIMS:

Durable biliary drainage is essential during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with pancreatic cancer who present with biliary obstruction. Plastic stents (PS) tend to occlude readily, resulting in delay/interruption of treatment. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) for biliary drainage in patients receiving NAT for pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

From 2009 to 2014, all consecutive patients with resectable pancreatic cancer at one tertiary center had SEMS placed for biliary drainage before NAT was started. Data on biliary drainage efficacy, stent malfunction rates and procedural adverse events were collected.

RESULTS:

One hundred forty-two consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer (mean age 66 ±â€Š9 SD years; 81 male, 61 female; 67 resectable, 75 borderline resectable) were enrolled. Eight-seven patients (61 %) had prior PS exchanged to SEMS and 55 (39 %) had SEMS placed upfront. Median duration from SEMS placement to the end of NAT/surgery was 111 days (range 44 - 282). During NAT, SEMS malfunction requiring reintervention occurred in 16 patients (11.2 %) tissue ingrowth 11, stent occlusion from food 6, stent migration 3, incomplete expansion 1, "tissue cheese-cutter" effect 1, and cystic duct obstruction 1. On subgroup analysis, no correlation between SEMS malfunction and stage of disease, prior PS, or duration of NAT was found (r 2  = 0.05, P  = 0.34). Presence of SEMS in situ did not affect pancreaticoduodenectomy.

CONCLUSION:

SEMS provide safe, effective and durable biliary drainage during NAT for pancreas cancer. Previously placed PS can be exchanged for SEMS. SEMS do not require removal prior to surgery.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Endosc Int Open Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Endosc Int Open Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos