Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing the reliability and validity of the Danish version of Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC).
Storkholm, Marie Höjriis; Mazzocato, Pamela; Tessma, Mesfin Kassaye; Savage, Carl.
Afiliación
  • Storkholm MH; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18A, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. Marie.storkholm@ki.se.
  • Mazzocato P; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. Marie.storkholm@ki.se.
  • Tessma MK; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18A, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Savage C; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Implement Sci ; 13(1): 78, 2018 06 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29871691
BACKGROUND: Organizational change initiatives in health care frequently achieve only partial implementation success. Understanding an organizational readiness for change (ORC) may be a way to develop more effective and efficient change strategies. Denmark, like many countries, has begun a major system-wide structural reform which involves considerable changes in service delivery. Due to the lack of a validated Danish instrument, we aimed to translate and validate a Danish version of the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) questionnaire. It measures if organizational members are confident in their collective commitment towards and ability (efficacy) to implement organizational change. ORIC is concise, grounded in theory, and designed, but not yet validated among employees in a real hospital setting. METHODS: The 12-item ORIC instrument was translated into Danish and back-translated to English. Employees (N = 284) at a hospital department facing a major organizational change in the Central Denmark Region completed the questionnaire. Face and content validity was ascertained. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to assess construct validity. Reliability was assessed with Cronbach's alpha. Item response theory (Rasch analysis) was used to determine item and person reliability. RESULTS: Response rate was 72%. A two factor (commitment and efficacy), 11-item scale, of the Danish language ORIC was shown to be valid (CFI = .95, RMSEA = .067, and CMNI/DF = 2.32) and reliable (Cronbach's alpha 0.88) in a health care setting. Item response analysis confirmed acceptable person and item separation reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Our version of ORIC showed acceptable validity and reliability as an instrument for measuring readiness for implementing organizational change in a Danish-speaking health care population. For health care managers interested in evaluating their organizations and tailor change strategies, ORIC's brevity and theoretical underpinnings could make it an appealing and feasible tool to develop more successful change efforts.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Innovación Organizacional / Psicometría / Encuestas y Cuestionarios / Personal de Salud / Atención a la Salud Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Implement Sci Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Innovación Organizacional / Psicometría / Encuestas y Cuestionarios / Personal de Salud / Atención a la Salud Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Implement Sci Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido