Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Toward harmonizing ecotoxicity characterization in life cycle impact assessment.
Fantke, Peter; Aurisano, Nicoló; Bare, Jane; Backhaus, Thomas; Bulle, Cécile; Chapman, Peter M; De Zwart, Dick; Dwyer, Robert; Ernstoff, Alexi; Golsteijn, Laura; Holmquist, Hanna; Jolliet, Olivier; McKone, Thomas E; Owsianiak, Mikolaj; Peijnenburg, Willie; Posthuma, Leo; Roos, Sandra; Saouter, Erwan; Schowanek, Diederik; van Straalen, Nico M; Vijver, Martina G; Hauschild, Michael.
Afiliación
  • Fantke P; Quantitative Sustainability Assessment Division, Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
  • Aurisano N; Quantitative Sustainability Assessment Division, Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
  • Bare J; US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
  • Backhaus T; Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Bulle C; Department of Strategy and Corporate Social Responsibility, International Reference Centre for the Life Cycle of Products, Processes and Services, School of Management, University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Chapman PM; Chapema Environmental Strategies, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • De Zwart D; DdZ Ecotox, Odijk, The Netherlands.
  • Dwyer R; International Copper Association, New York, New York, USA.
  • Ernstoff A; Quantis, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Golsteijn L; PRé Sustainability, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
  • Holmquist H; Department of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Jolliet O; School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • McKone TE; School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
  • Owsianiak M; Quantitative Sustainability Assessment Division, Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
  • Peijnenburg W; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
  • Posthuma L; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
  • Roos S; Department of Environmental Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Saouter E; Swerea IVF, Mölndal, Sweden.
  • Schowanek D; Directorate D-Sustainable Resources, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy.
  • van Straalen NM; Procter & Gamble, Strombeek-Bever, Belgium.
  • Vijver MG; Department of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Hauschild M; Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Environ Toxicol Chem ; 37(12): 2955-2971, 2018 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30178491
ABSTRACT
Ecosystem quality is an important area of protection in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). Chemical pollution has adverse impacts on ecosystems on a global scale. To improve methods for assessing ecosystem impacts, the Life Cycle Initiative hosted by the United Nations Environment Programme established a task force to evaluate the state-of-the-science in modeling chemical exposure of organisms and the resulting ecotoxicological effects for use in LCIA. The outcome of the task force work will be global guidance and harmonization by recommending changes to the existing practice of exposure and effect modeling in ecotoxicity characterization. These changes will reflect the current science and ensure the stability of recommended practice. Recommendations must work within the needs of LCIA in terms of 1) operating on information from any inventory reporting chemical emissions with limited spatiotemporal information, 2) applying best estimates rather than conservative assumptions to ensure unbiased comparison with results for other impact categories, and 3) yielding results that are additive across substances and life cycle stages and that will allow a quantitative expression of damage to the exposed ecosystem. We describe the current framework and discuss research questions identified in a roadmap. Primary research questions relate to the approach toward ecotoxicological effect assessment, the need to clarify the method's scope and interpretation of its results, the need to consider additional environmental compartments and impact pathways, and the relevance of effect metrics other than the currently applied geometric mean of toxicity effect data across species. Because they often dominate ecotoxicity results in LCIA, we give metals a special focus, including consideration of their possible essentiality and changes in environmental bioavailability. We conclude with a summary of key questions along with preliminary recommendations to address them as well as open questions that require additional research efforts. Environ Toxicol Chem 2018;372955-2971. © 2018 SETAC.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ecosistema / Contaminación Ambiental / Ecotoxicología Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Idioma: En Revista: Environ Toxicol Chem Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ecosistema / Contaminación Ambiental / Ecotoxicología Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Idioma: En Revista: Environ Toxicol Chem Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca