Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Image analysis with deep learning to predict breast cancer grade, ER status, histologic subtype, and intrinsic subtype.
Couture, Heather D; Williams, Lindsay A; Geradts, Joseph; Nyante, Sarah J; Butler, Ebonee N; Marron, J S; Perou, Charles M; Troester, Melissa A; Niethammer, Marc.
Afiliación
  • Couture HD; 1Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.
  • Williams LA; 2Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.
  • Geradts J; 3Department of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
  • Nyante SJ; 4Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.
  • Butler EN; 2Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.
  • Marron JS; 5Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.
  • Perou CM; 6Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.
  • Troester MA; 5Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.
  • Niethammer M; 7Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.
NPJ Breast Cancer ; 4: 30, 2018.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30182055
ABSTRACT
RNA-based, multi-gene molecular assays are available and widely used for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers. However, RNA-based genomic tests can be costly and are not available in many countries. Methods for inferring molecular subtype from histologic images may identify patients most likely to benefit from further genomic testing. To identify patients who could benefit from molecular testing based on H&E stained histologic images, we developed an image analysis approach using deep learning. A training set of 571 breast tumors was used to create image-based classifiers for tumor grade, ER status, PAM50 intrinsic subtype, histologic subtype, and risk of recurrence score (ROR-PT). The resulting classifiers were applied to an independent test set (n = 288), and accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of each was assessed on the test set. Histologic image analysis with deep learning distinguished low-intermediate vs. high tumor grade (82% accuracy), ER status (84% accuracy), Basal-like vs. non-Basal-like (77% accuracy), Ductal vs. Lobular (94% accuracy), and high vs. low-medium ROR-PT score (75% accuracy). Sampling considerations in the training set minimized bias in the test set. Incorrect classification of ER status was significantly more common for Luminal B tumors. These data provide proof of principle that molecular marker status, including a critical clinical biomarker (i.e., ER status), can be predicted with accuracy >75% based on H&E features. Image-based methods could be promising for identifying patients with a greater need for further genomic testing, or in place of classically scored variables typically accomplished using human-based scoring.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: NPJ Breast Cancer Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: NPJ Breast Cancer Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article