Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Heterotopic Ossification After Cervical Total Disc Replacement at 7 Years-Prevalence, Progression, Clinical Implications, and Risk Factors.
Nunley, Pierce D; Cavanaugh, David A; Kerr, Eubulus J; Utter, Phillip Andrew; Campbell, Peter G; Frank, Kelly A; Marshall, Kyle E; Stone, Marcus B.
Afiliación
  • Nunley PD; Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana.
  • Cavanaugh DA; Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana.
  • Kerr EJ; Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana.
  • Utter PA; Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana.
  • Campbell PG; Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana.
  • Frank KA; Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana.
  • Marshall KE; Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana.
  • Stone MB; Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana.
Int J Spine Surg ; 12(3): 352-361, 2018 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30276092
BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a known risk following cervical total disc replacement (CTDR) surgery, but the cause and effect of HO are not well understood. Reported HO rates vary, and few studies are specifically designed to report HO. The effects on outcomes, and the risk factors for the development of HO have been hypothesized and reported in small-population, retrospective analyses, using univariate statistics. METHODS: Posthoc, multiple-phase analysis of radiographic, clinical, and demographic data for CTDR as it relates to HO was performed. HO was radiographically graded for 164 one-level and 225 two-level CTDR patients using the McAfee and Mehren system. Analysis was performed to correlate HO grades to clinical outcomes and to evaluate potential risk factors for the development of HO using demographics and baseline clinical measures. RESULTS: At 7 years, 1-level clinically relevant HO grades were 17.6% grade 3 and 11.1% grade 4. Two-level clinically relevant HO grades, evaluated using the highest patient grade, were 26.6% grade 3 and 10.8% grade 4. Interaction between HO and time revealed significance for neck disability index (NDI; P = .04) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) neck pain (P = .02). When analyzed at each time point NDI was significant at 48-84 months and VAS neck at 60 months. For predictors 2 analyses were run; odds ratios indicated follow-up visit, male sex, and preoperative VAS neck pain are related to HO development, whereas hazard ratios indicated male sex, obesity, endplate coverage, levels treated, and preoperative VAS neck pain. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to report HO rates, and related outcomes and risk factors. To develop an accurate predictive model, further large-scale analyses need to be performed. Based on the results reported here, clinically relevant HO should be more accurately described as motion-restricting HO until a definitive link to outcomes has been established.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Spine Surg Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Spine Surg Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos