Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Inpatient Versus Outpatient Arthroplasty: A Single-Surgeon, Matched Cohort Analysis of 90-Day Complications.
Darrith, Brian; Frisch, Nicholas B; Tetreault, Matthew W; Fice, Michael P; Culvern, Chris N; Della Valle, Craig J.
Afiliación
  • Darrith B; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
  • Frisch NB; Ascension Crittenton Hospital, Rochester, MI.
  • Tetreault MW; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
  • Fice MP; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
  • Culvern CN; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
  • Della Valle CJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
J Arthroplasty ; 34(2): 221-227, 2019 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30415832
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although some prior work supports the safety of same-day arthroplasty performed in a hospital, concerns remain when these procedures are performed in a free-standing ambulatory surgery center. The purpose of this study is to compare 90-day complication rates between matched cohorts that underwent inpatient vs outpatient arthroplasty at an ambulatory surgery center.

METHODS:

A single-surgeon cohort of 243 consecutive patients who underwent outpatient arthroplasty was matched with 243 inpatients who had the same procedure. One-to-one nearest-neighbor matching with respect to gender, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists Score, and body mass index was utilized. The 486 primary arthroplasties included 178 unicondylar knees (36.6%), 146 total hips (30.0%), 92 total knees (18.9%), and 70 hip resurfacings (14.5%). Ninety-day outcomes including reoperation, readmission, unplanned clinic or emergency department visits, and major and minor complications were compared using a 2-sample proportions test.

RESULTS:

The 2 cohorts were similar in distribution of demographic variables, demonstrating successful matching. The inpatient and outpatient cohorts both had readmission rates of 2.1% (P = 1.0). With the number of subjects studied, there were no statistically significant differences in rates of major complications (2.1% vs 2.5%, P = 1.0), minor complications (7.0% vs 7.8%, P = .86), reoperations (0.4% vs 2.1%, P = .22), emergency department visits (1.6% vs 2.5%, P = .52), or unplanned clinic visits (3.3% vs 5.8%, P = .19).

CONCLUSION:

This study suggests that arthroplasty procedures can be performed safely in an ambulatory surgery center among appropriately selected patients without an increased risk of complications.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pacientes Ambulatorios / Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera / Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla / Pacientes Internos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pacientes Ambulatorios / Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera / Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla / Pacientes Internos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel