Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Opportunities for linking research to policy: lessons learned from implementation research in sexual and reproductive health within the ANSER network.
Ogbe, Emilomo; Van Braeckel, Dirk; Temmerman, Marleen; Larsson, Elin C; Keygnaert, Ines; De Los Reyes Aragón, Wilson; Cheng, Feng; Lazdane, Gunta; Cooper, Diane; Shamu, Simukai; Gichangi, Peter; Dias, Sónia; Barrett, Hazel; Nobels, Anne; Pei, Kaiyan; Galle, Anna; Esho, Tammary; Knight, Lucia; Tabana, Hanani; Degomme, Olivier.
Afiliación
  • Ogbe E; International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. emilomo.ogbe@ugent.be.
  • Van Braeckel D; International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Temmerman M; Ghent University, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Larsson EC; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University/Karolinska Institutet, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Keygnaert I; International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • De Los Reyes Aragón W; RFSU - the Swedish Association for Sexuality Education, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Cheng F; School of Medicine and Research Centre for Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
  • Lazdane G; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.
  • Cooper D; School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Shamu S; Foundation for Professional Development, Pretoria, South Africa.
  • Gichangi P; School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Dias S; University of Nairobi, Ghent University and International Centre for Reproductive Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Barrett H; Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Centro de Investigação em Saúde Pública, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Nobels A; Centre for Trust, Peace and Social relations, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.
  • Pei K; International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Galle A; National Research Institute for Family Planning, Beijing, China.
  • Esho T; International Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Knight L; Department of Community and Public Health, Technical University of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Tabana H; School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Degomme O; School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 16(1): 123, 2018 Dec 17.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30558612
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The uptake of findings from sexual and reproductive health and rights research into policy-making remains a complex and non-linear process. Different models of research utilisation and guidelines to maximise this in policy-making exist, however, challenges still remain for researchers to improve uptake of their research findings and for policy-makers to use research evidence in their work.

METHODS:

A participatory workshop with researchers was organised in November 2017 by the Academic Network for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Policy (ANSER) to address this gap. ANSER is a consortium of experienced researchers, some of whom have policy-making experience, working on sexual and reproductive health and rights issues across 16 countries and 5 continents. The experiential learning cycle was used to guide the workshop discussions based on case studies and to encourage participants to focus on key lessons learned. Workshop findings were thematically analysed using specific stages from Hanney et al.'s (Health Res Policy Syst 12, 2003) framework on the place of policy-making in the stages of assessment of research utilisation and outcomes.

RESULTS:

The workshop identified key strategies for translating research into policy, including joint agenda-setting between researchers and policy-makers, as well as building trust and partnerships with different stakeholders. These were linked to stages within Hanney et al.'s framework as opportunities for engaging with policy-makers to ensure uptake of research findings.

CONCLUSION:

The engagement of stakeholders during the research development and implementation phases, especially at strategic moments, has a positive impact on uptake of research findings. The strategies and stages described in this paper can be applied to improve utilisation of research findings into policy development and implementation globally.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Formulación de Políticas / Atención a la Salud / Investigación Biomédica Traslacional / Salud Reproductiva / Salud Sexual / Política de Salud / Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Implementation_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Health Res Policy Syst Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Formulación de Políticas / Atención a la Salud / Investigación Biomédica Traslacional / Salud Reproductiva / Salud Sexual / Política de Salud / Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Implementation_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Health Res Policy Syst Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Bélgica