Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Interventions for rosacea based on the phenotype approach: an updated systematic review including GRADE assessments.
van Zuuren, E J; Fedorowicz, Z; Tan, J; van der Linden, M M D; Arents, B W M; Carter, B; Charland, L.
Afiliación
  • van Zuuren EJ; Dermatology Department, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, 2333 ZA, the Netherlands.
  • Fedorowicz Z; DynaMed Plus, EBSCO Health, 10 Estes Street, Ipswich, MA, 01938, U.S.A.
  • Tan J; Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
  • van der Linden MMD; Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Arents BWM; Skin Patients Netherlands (Huidpatiënten Nederland), Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
  • Carter B; Biostatistics and Health Informatics, King's College London, London, U.K.
  • Charland L; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, U.K.
Br J Dermatol ; 181(1): 65-79, 2019 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30585305
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Rosacea is a common chronic facial dermatosis. Classification of rosacea has evolved from subtyping to phenotyping.

OBJECTIVES:

To update our systematic review on interventions for rosacea.

METHODS:

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index and ongoing trials registers (March 2018) for randomized controlled trials. Study selection, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessment and analyses were carried out independently by two authors. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) was used to assess certainty of evidence.

RESULTS:

We included 152 studies (46 were new), comprising 20 944 participants. Topical interventions included brimonidine, oxymetazoline, metronidazole, azelaic acid, ivermectin and other topical treatments. Systemic interventions included oral antibiotics, combinations with topical treatments or other systemic treatments. Several studies evaluated laser or light-based treatment. We present the most current evidence for rosacea management based on a phenotype-led approach.

CONCLUSIONS:

For reducing temporarily persistent erythema there was high-certainty evidence for topical brimonidine and moderate certainty for topical oxymetazoline; for erythema and mainly telangiectasia there was low-to-moderate-certainty evidence for laser and intense pulsed light therapy. For reducing papules/pustules there was high-certainty evidence for topical azelaic acid and topical ivermectin; moderate-to-high-certainty evidence for doxycycline 40 mg modified release (MR) and isotretinoin; and moderate-certainty evidence for topical metronidazole, and topical minocycline and oral minocycline being equally effective as doxycycline 40 mg MR. There was low-certainty evidence for tetracycline and low-dose minocycline. For ocular rosacea, there was moderate-certainty evidence that oral omega-3 fatty acids were effective and low-certainty evidence for ciclosporin ophthalmic emulsion and doxycycline.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Rosácea / Medicina Basada en la Evidencia / Dermatología / Dermatosis Facial Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Dermatol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Rosácea / Medicina Basada en la Evidencia / Dermatología / Dermatosis Facial Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Dermatol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos
...