Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of drug therapies for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion.
Qian, Tianwei; Zhao, Mengya; Wan, Yongjing; Li, MengXiao; Xu, Xun.
Afiliación
  • Qian T; Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, Shanghai, China.
  • Zhao M; Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, Shanghai, China.
  • Wan Y; School of Information Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
  • Li M; School of Information Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
  • Xu X; Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, Shanghai, China.
BMJ Open ; 8(12): e022700, 2018 12 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30593547
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents and corticosteroids for the treatment of macular oedema (ME) secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

DESIGN:

Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

PARTICIPANTS:

Patients from previously reported randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anti-VEGF and corticosteroids for the treatment of ME secondary to CRVO.

METHODS:

Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov until March 2017. Therapeutic effects were estimated using the proportions of patients gaining/losing ≥15 letters, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT). Treatment safety was estimated using the proportions of adverse events, namely increased intraocular pressure (IOP), cataracts, vitreous haemorrhage (VH) and retinal tear. The software ADDIS (V.1.16.8) was used for analysis. Treatment effect and safety of different drugs could be ranked based on simulation.

RESULTS:

Eleven RCTs comprising 2060 patients were identified. Regarding patients gaining ≥15 letters, aflibercept and ranibizumab were significantly more effective than sham/placebo at 6 months. Regarding patients losing ≥15 letters at 6 months, ranibizumab showed significant improvement compared with dexamethasone. Aflibercept, bevacizumab or ranibizumab showed greater improvements in BCVA than sham/placebo at 6 months. Intravitreal ranibizumab injection demonstrated greater CRT reduction than both sham and dexamethasone did. Dexamethasone had a higher risk of increased IOP than aflibercept and ranibizumab. Ranibizumab demonstrated a greater risk of cataracts than dexamethasone. Aflibercept and ranibizumab demonstrated low incidence of VH and retinal tear, respectively. Aflibercept had a slight advantage over ranibizumab as assessed by benefit-risk analysis.

CONCLUSIONS:

Anti-VEGF agents have advantages in the treatment of ME secondary to CRVO. Aflibercept and ranibizumab showed marked BCVA improvement and CRT reduction. Aflibercept may have a slight advantage over ranibizumab. The results of this study can serve as a reference for clinicians to provide patient-tailored treatment. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42017064076.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana / Edema Macular / Corticoesteroides / Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana / Edema Macular / Corticoesteroides / Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China