Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Which criteria are used to clear patients to return to sport after primary ACL reconstruction? A scoping review.
Burgi, Ciara R; Peters, Scott; Ardern, Clare L; Magill, John R; Gomez, Christina D; Sylvain, Jonathan; Reiman, Michael P.
Afiliación
  • Burgi CR; Department of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Peters S; Physical Therapy, Toronto Blue Jays Major League Baseball Club, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Ardern CL; Division of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Magill JR; School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Gomez CD; Department of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Sylvain J; Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Sugar Land Hospital, Sugar Land, Texas, USA.
  • Reiman MP; Hartford Healthcare Rehabilitaiton Network, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Br J Sports Med ; 53(18): 1154-1161, 2019 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30712009
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To describe the criteria used to clear athletes to return to sport (RTS) following primary ACL reconstruction.

DESIGN:

Scoping review. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus electronic databases were searched using keywords related to ACL and RTS. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Prospective or retrospective studies reporting at least one RTS criterion for athletes who had primary ACL reconstruction with an autograft.

RESULTS:

In total, 209 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. RTS criteria were categorised into six domains time, strength, hop testing, clinical examination, patient-report and performance-based criteria. From the 209 included studies, time was used in 178 studies (85%), and in 88 studies (42%) was the sole RTS criterion. Strength tests were reported in 86 studies (41%). Sixteen different hop tests were used in 31 studies (15%). Clinical examination was used in 54 studies (26%), patient report in 26 studies (12%) and performance-based criteria in 41 studies (20%).

SUMMARY:

Time and impairment-based measures dominated RTS criteria, despite sport being a complex physical and biopsychosocial activity with demands across all aspects of function. Time was included as a criterion in 85% of studies, and over 80% of studies allowed RTS before 9 months. Whether RTS tests are valid-do they predict successful RTS?-is largely unknown.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Traumatismos en Atletas / Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Volver al Deporte / Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Sports Med Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Traumatismos en Atletas / Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Volver al Deporte / Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Sports Med Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos