Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The psychological study of religion and spirituality in a disaster context: A systematic review.
Aten, Jamie D; Smith, Wendy R; Davis, Edward B; Van Tongeren, Daryl R; Hook, Joshua N; Davis, Don E; Shannonhouse, Laura; DeBlaere, Cirleen; Ranter, Jenn; O'Grady, Kari; Hill, Peter C.
Afiliación
  • Aten JD; Humanitarian Disaster Institute, Wheaton College.
  • Smith WR; School of Psychology, Counseling, and Family Therapy, Wheaton College.
  • Davis EB; School of Psychology, Counseling, and Family Therapy, Wheaton College.
  • Van Tongeren DR; Department of Psychology, Hope College.
  • Hook JN; Department of Psychology, University of North Texas.
  • Davis DE; Department of Counseling and Psychological Services, Georgia State University.
  • Shannonhouse L; Department of Counseling and Psychological Services, Georgia State University.
  • DeBlaere C; Department of Counseling and Psychological Services, Georgia State University.
  • Ranter J; Humanitarian Disaster Institute, Wheaton College.
  • O'Grady K; Loyola College of Maryland.
  • Hill PC; Rosemead School of Psychology, Biola University.
Psychol Trauma ; 11(6): 597-613, 2019 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30730187
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize the existing empirical psychology of religion/spirituality (R/S) and disaster research and offer a prospectus for future research.

METHOD:

Searches were conducted in PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Medline databases, and through personal communication with study authors covering a period from 1975 (from the earliest identified study meeting our criteria) to 2015. Studies that took an empirical approach to studying the impact of disasters on R/S phenomena, as well as the relationship between R/S phenomena, cognition, behavior, and well-being in disaster contexts were included.

RESULTS:

A total of 51 articles met the inclusion criteria. We organized the empirical findings under five main categories, which emerged from sorting studies by their primary R/S focus (a) general religiousness, (b) God representations, (c) religious appraisals, (d) R/S meaning making, and (e) religious coping. On the whole, R/S appears to generally lead to positive outcomes among disaster survivors. Results suggest positive benefits of R/S comes more from how one engages faith and access to resources via R/S communities.

CONCLUSIONS:

This review revealed several emerging patterns regarding what is known as well as existing gaps in the literature, including the need for more rigorous methodological designs and ongoing systematic programs of study. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Religión y Psicología / Sobrevivientes / Desastres Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Psychol Trauma Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Religión y Psicología / Sobrevivientes / Desastres Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Psychol Trauma Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article