Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Structural basis of transcriptional regulation by the HigA antitoxin.
Schureck, Marc A; Meisner, Jeffrey; Hoffer, Eric D; Wang, Dongxue; Onuoha, Nina; Ei Cho, Shein; Lollar, Pete; Dunham, Christine M.
Afiliación
  • Schureck MA; Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
  • Meisner J; Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
  • Hoffer ED; Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
  • Wang D; Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
  • Onuoha N; Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
  • Ei Cho S; Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
  • Lollar P; Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
  • Dunham CM; Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Mol Microbiol ; 111(6): 1449-1462, 2019 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30793388
ABSTRACT
Bacterial toxin-antitoxin systems are important factors implicated in growth inhibition and plasmid maintenance. Type II toxin-antitoxin pairs are regulated at the transcriptional level by the antitoxin itself. Here, we examined how the HigA antitoxin regulates the expression of the Proteus vulgaris higBA toxin-antitoxin operon from the Rts1 plasmid. The HigBA complex adopts a unique architecture suggesting differences in its regulation as compared to classical type II toxin-antitoxin systems. We find that the C-terminus of the HigA antitoxin is required for dimerization and transcriptional repression. Further, the HigA structure reveals that the C terminus is ordered and does not transition between disorder-to-order states upon toxin binding. HigA residue Arg40 recognizes a TpG dinucleotide in higO2, an evolutionary conserved mode of recognition among prokaryotic and eukaryotic transcription factors. Comparison of the HigBA and HigA-higO2 structures reveals the distance between helix-turn-helix motifs of each HigA monomer increases by ~4 Å in order to bind to higO2. Consistent with these data, HigBA binding to each operator is twofold less tight than HigA alone. Together, these data show the HigB toxin does not act as a co-repressor suggesting potential novel regulation in this toxin-antitoxin system.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proteus vulgaris / Proteínas Represoras / Proteínas Bacterianas / Regulación Bacteriana de la Expresión Génica Idioma: En Revista: Mol Microbiol Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR / MICROBIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proteus vulgaris / Proteínas Represoras / Proteínas Bacterianas / Regulación Bacteriana de la Expresión Génica Idioma: En Revista: Mol Microbiol Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR / MICROBIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos