[Federal Supreme Court Decisions in Medical Law (2000-2017) - Overview and Selected Case Reports]. / Bundesgerichtliche Urteile zum Arztrecht (20002017) Überblick, ausgewählte Kasuistik und Würdigung.
Praxis (Bern 1994)
; 108(3): 199-203, 2019.
Article
en De
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-30838953
ABSTRACT
Federal Supreme Court Decisions in Medical Law (2000-2017) - Overview and Selected Case Reports Abstract. Within the framework of an empirical and casuistic analysis of Federal Court decisions in medical law between 2000 and 2017, the goal was to describe tendencies and patterns of Federal Court decisions in medical law. Among other things, our results show that specialists in internal medicine, psychiatry, gynecology, obstetrics and surgery are more frequently involved in federal court proceedings. By contrast, pathologists, forensic specialists or (diagnostic) radiologists are rarely represented. This may be explained by the fact that the first group consists of more physicians than the other specialties. Furthermore, in the first group, either stronger action may be taken against the will of the patient (e.g. in the context of compulsory medication in psychiatry) or a possible breach of the duty of care is more obvious for the patient or his relatives or at least recognizable even without medical knowledge.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Médicos
/
Decisiones de la Corte Suprema
/
Ginecología
/
Medicina Interna
Tipo de estudio:
Prognostic_studies
Límite:
Female
/
Humans
/
Pregnancy
País/Región como asunto:
America do norte
Idioma:
De
Revista:
Praxis (Bern 1994)
Asunto de la revista:
MEDICINA
Año:
2019
Tipo del documento:
Article