Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tactical Scientific Decision-Making during Crewed Astrobiology Mars Missions.
Stevens, A H; Kobs Nawotniak, S E; Garry, W B; Payler, S J; Brady, A L; Miller, M J; Beaton, K H; Cockell, C S; Lim, D S S.
Afiliación
  • Stevens AH; 1 UK Centre for Astrobiology, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Kobs Nawotniak SE; 2 Department of Geosciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, USA.
  • Garry WB; 3 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA.
  • Payler SJ; 1 UK Centre for Astrobiology, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Brady AL; 4 School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Miller MJ; 5 Georgia Institute of Technology College of Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Beaton KH; 6 NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Cockell CS; 1 UK Centre for Astrobiology, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Lim DSS; 7 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA.
Astrobiology ; 19(3): 369-386, 2019 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30840503
ABSTRACT
The limitations placed upon human explorers on the surface of Mars will necessitate a methodology for scientific exploration that is different from standard approaches to terrestrial fieldwork and prior crewed exploration of the Moon. In particular, the data transmission limitations and communication latency between Earth and Mars create a unique situation for surface crew in contact with a terrestrial science team. The BASALT research program simulated a series of extravehicular activities (EVAs) in Mars analog terrains under various Mars-relevant bandwidth and latency conditions to investigate how best to approach this problem. Here we discuss tactical decision-making under these conditions, that is, how the crew on Mars interacts with a team of scientists and support personnel on Earth to collect samples of maximum scientific interest. We describe the strategies, protocols, and tools tested in BASALT EVAs and give recommendations on how best to conduct human exploration of Mars with support from Earth-based scientists. We find that even with scientists supporting them, the crew performing the exploration must be trained in the appropriate scientific disciplines in order to provide the terrestrial scientists with enough information to make decisions, but that with appropriate planning and structure, and tools such as a "dynamic leaderboard," terrestrial scientists can add scientific value to an EVA, even under Mars communication latency.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Comunicaciones por Satélite / Comunicación / Marte / Astronautas / Toma de Decisiones Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Astrobiology Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Comunicaciones por Satélite / Comunicación / Marte / Astronautas / Toma de Decisiones Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Astrobiology Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido