Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk factors for new bovine brucellosis infections in Colombian herds.
Cárdenas, Liliana; Peña, Mario; Melo, Oscar; Casal, Jordi.
Afiliación
  • Cárdenas L; Animal Medicine and Health Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Campus of The Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain. zlilianac@yahoo.es.
  • Peña M; The Centre for Research into Animal Health (CReSA), Campus of The Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain. zlilianac@yahoo.es.
  • Melo O; Animal Health Department, Colombian Veterinary service, Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario-ICA, 11161, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Casal J; The Statistics Department, Faculty of Science, National University of Colombia, 11001, Bogotá, D.C, Colombia.
BMC Vet Res ; 15(1): 81, 2019 Mar 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30845954
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Bovine brucellosis is a zoonotic disease that causes substantial economic losses and has a strong impact on public health. The main objective of this paper is to determine the risk factors for new infections of Brucella abortus on Colombian cattle farms previously certified as being free of brucellosis. A case-control study was conducted by comparing 98 cases (farms certified as brucellosis-free for three or more years but became infected) with 93 controls (farms that remained brucellosis-free during at least the previous three years). The farms were matched by herd size and geographical location (municipality). Information was obtained via a questionnaire completed by veterinary officers through a personal interview with the herd owners.

RESULTS:

Two-thirds of the herds (67%) were dairy herds, 16% were beef herds, and 17% were dual-purpose (beef and milk) herds. After exploratory univariate analysis, all explanatory variables with a p-value of ≤0.20 were included in a logistic regression model using the forward stepwise method to select the model with the best goodness of fit. The significant risk factors were the replacement of animals from farms not certified as brucellosis-free compared to replacement from certified brucellosis-free farms (OR = 4.84, p-value < 0.001) and beef cattle farms compared to dairy cattle farms (OR = 3.61, p-value = 0.017). When herds with and without artificial insemination were compared, it was observed that farms that used natural breeding with bulls from non-certified herds had a higher risk than farms using artificial insemination (OR = 2.45, p-value = 0.037), but when the bulls came from brucellosis-free farms, farms with natural breeding were less affected (OR = 0.30, p-value = 0.004) than farms using artificial insemination, whether with frozen semen from certified brucellosis-free herds or fresh semen from uncontrolled herds. The latter is commonly sold to neighbouring farms.

CONCLUSIONS:

The government should make efforts to inform farmers about the risks involved in the introduction of semen and replacement heifers from farms that are not certified as brucellosis-free and to establish measures to control these practices.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Brucelosis Bovina Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Animals País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Colombia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Vet Res Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA VETERINARIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Brucelosis Bovina Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Animals País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Colombia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Vet Res Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA VETERINARIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España