Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Risk of Cardiovascular Events With Biologic and Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Singh, Siddharth; Fumery, Mathurin; Singh, Abha G; Singh, Namrata; Prokop, Larry J; Dulai, Parambir S; Sandborn, William J; Curtis, Jeffrey R.
Afiliación
  • Singh S; University of California San Diego, La Jolla.
  • Fumery M; Amiens University and Hospital and Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.
  • Singh AG; University of California San Diego, La Jolla.
  • Singh N; University of Washington, Seattle.
  • Prokop LJ; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Dulai PS; University of California San Diego, La Jolla.
  • Sandborn WJ; University of California San Diego, La Jolla.
  • Curtis JR; University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 72(4): 561-576, 2020 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30875456
OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effects of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), non-TNFi biologics, and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) on cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Using a systematic search through May 8, 2018, we included 14 observational studies in adults with RA treated with TNFi, non-TNFi biologics, tofacitinib, or csDMARDs, reporting the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or stroke. Only studies reporting active comparators were included. We performed random effects meta-analysis and estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: As compared to TNFi, tocilizumab was associated with a decreased risk of MACE (OR 0.59 [95% CI 0.34-1.00]), whereas csDMARDs were associated with an increased risk of MACE (csDMARDs including methotrexate OR 1.45 [95% CI 1.09-1.93]; without methotrexate OR 2.57 [95% CI 1.32-5.00]), without heterogeneity (I2 = 0%); there was no difference in risk of MACE between abatacept and TNFi (OR 0.89 [95% CI 0.71-1.11]), or between tocilizumab and abatacept (OR 0.81 [0.57-1.16]). Based on 11 cohorts (n = 135,053 patients), as compared to TNFi, csDMARDs were associated with an increased risk of stroke (OR 1.17 [95% CI 1.01-1.36]); there was no difference in risk of stroke between different biologics (tocilizumab versus TNFi OR 0.98 [95% CI 0.59-1.61]; abatacept versus TNFi OR 1.08 [0.86-1.34]; tocilizumab versus abatacept OR 0.73 [95% CI 0.39-1.38]), without heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). No comparative studies on cardiovascular risk with tofacitinib were identified. CONCLUSION: Based on meta-analysis, as compared to TNFi, tocilizumab may be associated with a reduced risk of MACE, whereas csDMARDs may be associated with an increased risk of MACE and stroke.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artritis Reumatoide / Productos Biológicos / Enfermedades Cardiovasculares / Antirreumáticos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Asunto de la revista: REUMATOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artritis Reumatoide / Productos Biológicos / Enfermedades Cardiovasculares / Antirreumáticos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Asunto de la revista: REUMATOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos