Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reduced signal for polygenic adaptation of height in UK Biobank.
Berg, Jeremy J; Harpak, Arbel; Sinnott-Armstrong, Nasa; Joergensen, Anja Moltke; Mostafavi, Hakhamanesh; Field, Yair; Boyle, Evan August; Zhang, Xinjun; Racimo, Fernando; Pritchard, Jonathan K; Coop, Graham.
Afiliación
  • Berg JJ; Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, United States.
  • Harpak A; Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, United States.
  • Sinnott-Armstrong N; Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
  • Joergensen AM; Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
  • Mostafavi H; Lundbeck GeoGenetics Centre, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Field Y; Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, United States.
  • Boyle EA; Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
  • Zhang X; Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
  • Racimo F; Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States.
  • Pritchard JK; Lundbeck GeoGenetics Centre, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Coop G; Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Elife ; 82019 03 21.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30895923
ABSTRACT
Several recent papers have reported strong signals of selection on European polygenic height scores. These analyses used height effect estimates from the GIANT consortium and replication studies. Here, we describe a new analysis based on the the UK Biobank (UKB), a large, independent dataset. We find that the signals of selection using UKB effect estimates are strongly attenuated or absent. We also provide evidence that previous analyses were confounded by population stratification. Therefore, the conclusion of strong polygenic adaptation now lacks support. Moreover, these discrepancies highlight (1) that methods for correcting for population stratification in GWAS may not always be sufficient for polygenic trait analyses, and (2) that claims of differences in polygenic scores between populations should be treated with caution until these issues are better understood. Editorial note This article has been through an editorial process in which the authors decide how to respond to the issues raised during peer review. The Reviewing Editor's assessment is that all the issues have been addressed (see decision letter).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Selección Genética / Estatura / Adaptación Biológica / Herencia Multifactorial Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Elife Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Selección Genética / Estatura / Adaptación Biológica / Herencia Multifactorial Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Elife Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...