Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A practical guide for combining data to model species distributions.
Fletcher, Robert J; Hefley, Trevor J; Robertson, Ellen P; Zuckerberg, Benjamin; McCleery, Robert A; Dorazio, Robert M.
Afiliación
  • Fletcher RJ; Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110430, 110 Newins-Ziegler Hall, Gainesville, Florida, 32611-0430, USA.
  • Hefley TJ; Department of Statistics, Kansas State University, 205 Dickens Hall, Manhattan, Kansas, 66506-0802, USA.
  • Robertson EP; Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110430, 110 Newins-Ziegler Hall, Gainesville, Florida, 32611-0430, USA.
  • Zuckerberg B; Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin, 226 Russell Labs, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706-1598, USA.
  • McCleery RA; Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110430, 110 Newins-Ziegler Hall, Gainesville, Florida, 32611-0430, USA.
  • Dorazio RM; Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, California, 94132, USA.
Ecology ; 100(6): e02710, 2019 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30927270
ABSTRACT
Understanding and accurately modeling species distributions lies at the heart of many problems in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Multiple sources of data are increasingly available for modeling species distributions, such as data from citizen science programs, atlases, museums, and planned surveys. Yet reliably combining data sources can be challenging because data sources can vary considerably in their design, gradients covered, and potential sampling biases. We review, synthesize, and illustrate recent developments in combining multiple sources of data for species distribution modeling. We identify five ways in which multiple sources of data are typically combined for modeling species distributions. These approaches vary in their ability to accommodate sampling design, bias, and uncertainty when quantifying environmental relationships in species distribution models. Many of the challenges for combining data are solved through the prudent use of integrated species distribution models models that simultaneously combine different data sources on species locations to quantify environmental relationships for explaining species distribution. We illustrate these approaches using planned survey data on 24 species of birds coupled with opportunistically collected eBird data in the southeastern United States. This example illustrates some of the benefits of data integration, such as increased precision in environmental relationships, greater predictive accuracy, and accounting for sample bias. Yet it also illustrates challenges of combining data sources with vastly different sampling methodologies and amounts of data. We provide one solution to this challenge through the use of weighted joint likelihoods. Weighted joint likelihoods provide a means to emphasize data sources based on different criteria (e.g., sample size), and we find that weighting improves predictions for all species considered. We conclude by providing practical guidance on combining multiple sources of data for modeling species distributions.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aves / Ecología Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Ecology Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aves / Ecología Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Ecology Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos