Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats.
Sosa, Rodrigo; Saavedra, Pablo; Niño de Rivera, Roberto; Lago, Gustavo; Moreno, Patsy; Galicia-Castillo, Oscar; Hernández-Guerrero, César; Buenrostro-Jáuregui, Mario.
Afiliación
  • Sosa R; Laboratorio de Neurociencias, Universidad Iberoamericana; r.sosa.s1984@gmail.com.
  • Saavedra P; Departamento de Psicología, Universidad Anáhuac México Sur.
  • Niño de Rivera R; Laboratorio de Neurociencias, Universidad Iberoamericana.
  • Lago G; Laboratorio de Neurociencias, Universidad Iberoamericana.
  • Moreno P; Laboratorio de Neurociencias, Universidad Iberoamericana.
  • Galicia-Castillo O; Laboratorio de Neurociencias, Universidad Iberoamericana.
  • Hernández-Guerrero C; Departamento de Salud, Universidad Iberoamericana.
  • Buenrostro-Jáuregui M; Laboratorio de Neurociencias, Universidad Iberoamericana; mario.buenrostro@ibero.mx.
J Vis Exp ; (145)2019 03 17.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30933076
ABSTRACT
The present article provides a guide for the conduction and analysis of three conditioning-based protocols to evaluate impulsivity in rats. Impulsivity is a meaningful concept because it is associated with psychiatric conditions in humans and with maladaptive behavior in non-human animals. It is believed that impulsivity is composed of separate factors. There are laboratory protocols devised to assess each of these factors using standardized automated equipment. Delay discounting is associated with the incapacity to be motivated by delayed outcomes. This factor is evaluated through intertemporal choice protocols, which consist of presenting the individual with a choice situation involving an immediate reward and a larger but delayed reward. Response inhibition deficit is associated with the incapacity to withhold prepotent responses. Differential reinforcement of low rates (DLR) and feature-negative discrimination protocols assess the response inhibition deficit factor of impulsivity. The former imposes a condition to a motivated individual in which most wait a minimum period of time for a response to be rewarded. The latter evaluates the capacity of individuals to refrain from food seeking responses when a signal of the absence of food is presented. The purpose of these protocols is to construct an objective quantitative measure of impulsivity, which serves to make cross-species comparisons, allowing the possibility of translational research. The advantages of these particular protocols include their easy set-up and application, which stems from the relatively small amount of equipment needed and the automated nature of these protocols.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conducta Impulsiva / Laboratorios Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Vis Exp Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conducta Impulsiva / Laboratorios Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Vis Exp Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article