Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patients' ratings of the in-hospital discharge briefing and post-discharge primary care follow-up: The association with 30-day readmissions.
Rayan-Gharra, Nosaiba; Shadmi, Efrat; Tadmor, Boaz; Flaks-Manov, Natalie; Balicer, Ran D.
Afiliación
  • Rayan-Gharra N; The Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. Electronic address: nrayan@univ.haifa.ac.il.
  • Shadmi E; The Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel; The Clalit Research Institute, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Tadmor B; Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
  • Flaks-Manov N; The Clalit Research Institute, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Balicer RD; The Clalit Research Institute, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Patient Educ Couns ; 102(8): 1513-1519, 2019 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30987768
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

We examined whether patients' ratings of their in-hospital discharge briefing and their post-discharge Primary Care Physicians' (PCP) review of the discharge summary are associated with 30-day readmissions.

METHODS:

A prospective study of 594 internal-medicine patients at a tertiary medical-center in Israel. The in-hospital baseline questionnaire included sociodemographic characteristics, physical, mental, and functional health status. Patients were surveyed by phone about the discharge and post-discharge processes. Clinical data and health-service use was retrieved from a central data-warehouse. Multivariate regressions modeled the relationship between in-hospital baseline characteristics, discharge briefing, PCP visit indicator, the PCP discharge summary review, and 30-day readmissions.

RESULTS:

The extent of the PCPs' review of the hospital discharge summary at the post-discharge visit was rated higher than the in-hospital discharge briefing (3.46 vs. 3.17, p = 0.001) and was associated with lower odds of readmission (OR=0.35, 95% CI 0.26-0.45). The model that included this assessment performed better than the in-hospital baseline, the in-hospital discharge-briefing, and the PCP visit models (C-statistic = 0.87, compared with 0.70, 0.81, 0.81, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

Providing extensive post-discharge explanations by PCPs serves as a significant protective factor against readmissions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS PCPs should be encouraged to thoroughly review the discharge summary letter with the patient.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Alta del Paciente / Readmisión del Paciente / Atención Primaria de Salud / Satisfacción del Paciente / Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Patient Educ Couns Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Alta del Paciente / Readmisión del Paciente / Atención Primaria de Salud / Satisfacción del Paciente / Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Patient Educ Couns Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article