Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Competency in Quality: Defining the Scope and Nature of Quality Competencies for Radiation Oncology Residency Programs.
Gillan, Caitlin; Yip, Kathy Wan Ting; Adleman, Jenna; Giuliani, Meredith.
Afiliación
  • Gillan C; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: caitlin.gillan@rmp.uhn.on.ca.
  • Yip KWT; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
  • Adleman J; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Giuliani M; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci ; 47(2): 139-146, 2016 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31047177
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Quality and safety in radiation treatment have garnered increasing attention in recent years. With the introduction of the CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework, incorporation of patient safety and quality improvement will be required across all seven established physician roles for radiation oncology residents. An appreciation for the competency areas relevant to radiation oncologists (ROs) in the quality and safety domain is thus needed to inform training in this area.

METHODS:

Semistructured interprofessional focus groups were held with ROs, medical physicists, and radiation therapists to ascertain the scope of quality principles required of newly certified ROs, to identify current teaching best practices, and to define required competencies in this area. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and data analyzed iteratively and coded using a constant comparison method.

RESULTS:

Three focus groups were held with 20 participants overall, and an average duration of 68 minutes (range 47-81 minutes). Participants found it difficult to define quality but noted that for residents it might encompass competencies in peer review, incident and change management, and quality culture. Although addressed in various ways in current residency programs, it was thought that explicit acknowledgment of relevant "nonmedical expert" quality competencies would ensure adequate attention in residency.

CONCLUSIONS:

Quality and safety are important concepts in radiation oncology, warranting attention in residency training to develop the knowledge, skills, and behaviour necessary in practice.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: J Med Imaging Radiat Sci Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: J Med Imaging Radiat Sci Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article
...