Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systematically Incorporating Environmental Objectives into Shale Gas Pipeline Development: A Binary Integer, Multiobjective Spatial Optimization Model.
Kroetz, Kailin; Shih, Jhih-Shyang; Siikamäki, Juha V; Marianov, Vladimir; Krupnick, Alan; Chu, Ziyan.
Afiliación
  • Kroetz K; Resources for the Future , 1616 P St. NW , Washington , D.C. 20036 , United States.
  • Shih JS; Resources for the Future , 1616 P St. NW , Washington , D.C. 20036 , United States.
  • Siikamäki JV; International Union for Conservation of Nature , 1630 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 300 , Washington , D.C. 20009 , United States.
  • Marianov V; Department of Electrical Engineering , Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile , Av. Vicuna Mackenna 4860 , Santiago , Chile.
  • Krupnick A; Resources for the Future , 1616 P St. NW , Washington , D.C. 20036 , United States.
  • Chu Z; First Street Foundation , Brooklyn , New York 11201 , United States.
Environ Sci Technol ; 53(12): 7155-7162, 2019 06 18.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31050415
ABSTRACT
Shale gas pipeline development can have negative environmental impacts, including adverse effects on species and ecosystems through habitat degradation and loss. From a societal perspective, pipeline development planning processes should account for such externalities. We develop a multiobjective binary integer-programming model, called the Multi Objective Pipeline Siting (MOPS) model, to incorporate habitat externalities into pipeline development and to estimate the trade-offs between pipeline development costs and habitat impacts. We demonstrate the utility of the model using an application from Bradford and Susquehanna counties in northeastern Pennsylvania. We find that significant habitat impacts can be avoided for relatively low cost, but the avoidance of the additional habitat impacts becomes gradually and increasingly costly. For example, 10% of the habitat impacts can be avoided at less than a two percent pipeline cost increase relative to a configuration that ignores habitat impacts. MOPS or a similar model could be integrated into the pipeline siting and permitting process so oil and gas companies, communities, and states can identify cost-effective options for habitat conservation near shale gas development.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ecosistema / Gas Natural País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Environ Sci Technol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ecosistema / Gas Natural País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Environ Sci Technol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos