Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Social Participation of Burn Survivors and the General Population in Work and Employment: A Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Profile Study.
Saret, Cayla J; Ni, Pengsheng; Marino, Molly; Dore, Emily; Ryan, Colleen M; Schneider, Jeffrey C; Kazis, Lewis E.
Afiliación
  • Saret CJ; Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Massachusetts.
  • Ni P; Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Massachusetts.
  • Marino M; Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Massachusetts.
  • Dore E; Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Massachusetts.
  • Ryan CM; Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
  • Schneider JC; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Kazis LE; Shriners Hospitals for Children-Boston®, Massachusetts.
J Burn Care Res ; 40(5): 669-677, 2019 08 14.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31069384
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Work integration and retention after burn injury is a key outcome. Little is known about how burn survivors reintegrate into the workplace. This article compares scores on the Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Profile, a burn-specific measure of social participation, between burn survivors and general population samples, focusing on the Work and Employment domain.

METHODS:

Convenience samples of burn survivors and the U.S. population were obtained. Differences in demographic and clinical characteristics and LIBRE Profile scores were assessed. To examine work and employment, we compared family and friends, social activities, and social interactions scores among working vs nonworking burn survivors.

RESULTS:

Six hundred and one burn survivors (320 employed) and 2000 U.S. residents (1101 employed) were surveyed. The mean age (P = .06), distributions of sex (P = .35), and Hispanic ethnicity (P = .07) did not differ significantly. Distributions of race (P < .01) and education (P = .01) differed significantly. The burn survivor sample had higher scores, demonstrating higher participation, for work and employment (mean = 49.5, SD = 9.42) than the general sample (mean = 46.94, SD = 8.94; P < .0001), which persisted after adjusting for demographic characteristics. Scores on the three domains administered to all respondents were higher (P < .001) for working than nonworking burn survivors.

CONCLUSION:

Distributions indicated higher social participation in the burn survivor sample than the general sample. Possible explanations include sample bias; resilience, posttraumatic growth, or response-shift of survivors; and limitations of using items in the general sample. Working burn survivors scored higher than those not working. Future work can explore factors that mediate higher scores and develop interventions.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conducta Social / Quemaduras / Sobrevivientes / Participación Social Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Burn Care Res Asunto de la revista: TRAUMATOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conducta Social / Quemaduras / Sobrevivientes / Participación Social Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Burn Care Res Asunto de la revista: TRAUMATOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article
...