Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Phentolamine Reverses Epinephrine-Enhanced Skin Antinociception of Dibucaine in Rats.
Chou, An-Kuo; Chiu, Chong-Chi; Chen, Yu-Wen; Wang, Jhi-Joung; Hung, Ching-Hsia.
Afiliación
  • Chou AK; From the Department of Anesthesiology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
  • Chiu CC; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
  • Chen YW; Department of General Surgery, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan and Liouying, Taiwan, Republic of China.
  • Wang JJ; Department of Electrical Engineering, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Tainan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
  • Hung CH; Department of Medical Research, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Anesth Analg ; 128(6): 1336-1343, 2019 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31094809
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The objective of the experiment was to assess the antinociceptive effect of dibucaine, bupivacaine, and epinephrine. To assess the mechanism of action of the interaction between dibucaine and epinephrine, phentolamine, a nonselective α-adrenergic antagonist, was added to the mixture.

METHODS:

We assessed sensory blockade with these drugs by injecting 0.6 mL of drug-in-saline in the dorsal thoracolumbar area of rats; pinprick of the "wheal" formed by the injectate was the area targeted for stimulation to elicit a cutaneous trunci muscle reflex. The sensory block of dibucaine was compared with that of bupivacaine or epinephrine. Drug-drug interactions were analyzed by isobologram. Phentolamine was added to investigate the antinociceptive effect of dibucaine coinjected with epinephrine.

RESULTS:

We demonstrated that dibucaine, epinephrine, and bupivacaine produced dose-dependent skin antinociception. On the median effective dose (ED50) basis, the potency was higher for epinephrine (mean, 0.011 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.007-0.015] µmol) than for dibucaine (mean, 0.493 [95% CI, 0.435-0.560] µmol) (P < .01), while there were no significant differences between dibucaine and bupivacaine (mean, 0.450 [95% CI, 0.400-0.505] µmol). On the equipotent basis (75% effective dose, median effective dose, and 25% effective dose), sensory block duration provoked by epinephrine was greater (P < .01) than that provoked by dibucaine or bupivacaine. Coadministration of dibucaine with epinephrine produced a synergistic nociceptive block, whereas phentolamine blocked that synergistic block.

CONCLUSIONS:

The preclinical data indicated that there is no statistically significant difference between the potency and duration of dibucaine and bupivacaine in this model. Epinephrine synergistically enhances the effects of dibucaine, while phentolamine partially blocked those effects. α-Adrenergic receptors play an important role in controlling synergistic analgesic effect of dibucaine combined with epinephrine.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fentolamina / Piel / Bupivacaína / Epinefrina / Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa / Dibucaína / Analgésicos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Anesth Analg Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fentolamina / Piel / Bupivacaína / Epinefrina / Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa / Dibucaína / Analgésicos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Anesth Analg Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China