Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Applied Epidemiology Workforce Growth and Capacity Challenges: The Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists 2017 Epidemiology Capacity Assessment.
Arrazola, Jessica; Israel, Mia N; Binkin, Nancy.
Afiliación
  • Arrazola J; 1 Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Israel MN; 1 Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Binkin N; 2 Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Public Health Rep ; 134(4): 379-385, 2019.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31161923
OBJECTIVES: To better understand the current status and challenges of the state public health department workforce, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) assessed the number and functions of applied public health epidemiologists at state health departments in the United States. METHODS: In 2017, CSTE emailed unique online assessment links to state epidemiologists in the 50 states and the District of Columbia (N = 51). The response rate was 100%. CSTE analyzed quantitative data (27 questions) on funding, the number of current and needed epidemiologists, recruitment, retention, perceived capacity, and training. CSTE coded qualitative data in response to an open-ended question that asked about the most important problems state epidemiologists face. RESULTS: Most funding for epidemiologic activities came from the federal government (mean, 77%). State epidemiologists reported needing 1199 additional epidemiologists to achieve ideal capacity but noted challenges in recruiting qualified staff members. Respondents cited opportunities for promotion (n = 45, 88%), salary (n = 41, 80%), restrictions on merit raises (n = 36, 70%), and losses to the private or government sector (n = 33, 65%) as problems for retention. Of 4 Essential Public Health Services measured, most state epidemiologists reported substantial-to-full capacity to monitor health status (n = 43, 84%) and diagnose and investigate community health problems (n = 47, 92%); fewer respondents reported substantial-to-full capacity to conduct evaluations (n = 20, 39%) and research (n = 11, 22%). CONCLUSIONS: Reliance on federal funding negatively affects employee retention, core capacity, and readiness at state health departments. Creative solutions for providing stable funding, developing greater flexibility to respond to emerging threats, and enhancing capacity in evaluation and applied research are needed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Administración en Salud Pública / Epidemiología / Recursos Humanos / Creación de Capacidad / Epidemiólogos / Fuerza Laboral en Salud Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Public Health Rep Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Administración en Salud Pública / Epidemiología / Recursos Humanos / Creación de Capacidad / Epidemiólogos / Fuerza Laboral en Salud Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Public Health Rep Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos