Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Level of contact hypersensitivity response to diphencyprone and keratinocyte cancer.
Bullen, A; Polcz, M; Rowe, C J; Byrom, L; Soyer, H P; Khosrotehrani, K.
Afiliación
  • Bullen A; Department of Dermatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Polcz M; Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Rowe CJ; Queensland Institute of Dermatology, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Byrom L; Department of Dermatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Soyer HP; Department of Dermatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Khosrotehrani K; Department of Dermatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 33(11): 2101-2105, 2019 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31265155
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Keratinocyte cancers (KC) are common and pose a significant financial burden globally. Ultraviolet radiation is a significant factor in their development, through mutagenesis promotion but also through local and systemic immunosuppression. Although systemic immunosuppression is well understood, cutaneous immunity has been more difficult to evaluate.

OBJECTIVES:

This study used a contact sensitizer, diphencyprone (DPCP), which elicits a contact hypersensitivity reaction in skin, to compare the degree of reactivity to DPCP in patients with a high KC burden versus those with a low KC burden.

METHODS:

A prospective study was performed in immunocompetent patients aged 70 ± 5 years of age, comparing patients with a high KC burden (>10 previous KC) with those with a low KC burden (<2 previous KC). All patients were sensitized with 2% DPCP and then patch tested two weeks later with eight different concentrations of DPCP with the threshold concentration and total degree of reaction recorded.

RESULTS:

Nine patients were recruited, 5 in the 'high cancer' group and 4 in the 'low cancer' group. All patients were Fitzpatrick skin type 1 or 2. All patients developed a reaction to DPCP. Patients in the low cancer group developed a reaction at a significantly lower threshold DPCP concentration than the high cancer group (P = 0.039). The cumulative intensity of reaction was higher in the low cancer group (P = 0.087).

CONCLUSION:

Patients with a high KC burden required a higher threshold concentration of DPCP to elicit a hypersensitivity reaction, supporting the concept of a lower skin immunity in these patients. DPCP reactivity threshold could be a useful tool in the evaluation of skin immunity and propensity to develop keratinocyte cancers.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Queratinocitos / Ciclopropanos / Dermatitis por Contacto Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Asunto de la revista: DERMATOLOGIA / DOENCAS SEXUALMENTE TRANSMISSIVEIS Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Queratinocitos / Ciclopropanos / Dermatitis por Contacto Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Asunto de la revista: DERMATOLOGIA / DOENCAS SEXUALMENTE TRANSMISSIVEIS Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia