Comparison of warm vertical compaction and cold lateral condensation of α, ß gutta-percha and resilon on apically extruded debris during retreatment.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris removed from a root canal filled with cold lateral condensation (CLC), and warm vertical compaction (WVC) techniques, using b or a phase gutta-percha with AH-Plus (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) or Resilon (Resilon Research LLC, Madison, WI) with RealSeal SE (SybronEndo, Amersfoort, The Netherlands). MATERIALS AND METHODS: About 100 human incisor teeth were prepared with a #25.06 NiTi rotary system and divided into five groups according to the filling material used Group 1 CLC (gutta-percha, AH-Plus); Group 2 WVC (b phase gutta-percha, AH-Plus); Group 3 WVC (a phase gutta-percha, AH-Plus); Group 4 CLC (Resilon, RealSeal SE); and Group 5 WVC (Resilon, RealSeal SE). Extruded debris during the retreatment procedure was collected in preweighed Eppendorf tubes. The times required for retreatment were recorded. RESULTS: The amount of debris extrusion was significantly greater with WVC than CLC in the gutta-percha and Resilon groups (P < 0.001). Using a phase gutta-percha resulted in significantly more debris extrusion than b phase gutta-percha (P < 0.001). In the WVC groups, Resilon caused significantly more debris extrusion than gutta-percha (P < 0.05). Retreatment was faster for CLC than WVC (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the retreatment procedure, the amount of apically extruded debris and retreatment duration were dependent on the type of obturation material and technique used.