Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How often do prescribers include indications in drug orders? Analysis of 4 million outpatient prescriptions.
Salazar, Alejandra; Karmiy, Samuel J; Forsythe, Katherine J; Amato, Mary G; Wright, Adam; Lai, Kenneth H; Lambert, Bruce L; Liebovitz, David M; Eguale, Tewodros; Volk, Lynn A; Schiff, Gordon D.
Afiliación
  • Salazar A; Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA.
  • Karmiy SJ; Partners HealthCare, Somerville, MA.
  • Forsythe KJ; Partners HealthCare, Somerville, MA.
  • Amato MG; Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, MCPHS University, Boston, MA.
  • Wright A; Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • Lai KH; Partners HealthCare, Somerville, MA, and Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.
  • Lambert BL; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
  • Liebovitz DM; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
  • Eguale T; Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, MCPHS University, Boston, MA.
  • Volk LA; Partners HealthCare, Somerville, MA.
  • Schiff GD; Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 76(13): 970-979, 2019 Jun 18.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31361884
PURPOSE: To examine the extent to which outpatient clinicians currently document drug indications in prescription instructions. METHODS: Free-text sigs were extracted from all outpatient prescriptions generated by the computerized prescriber order entry system of a major academic institution during a 5-year period. Natural language processing was used to identify drug indications. The data set was analyzed to determine the rates at which prescribers included indications. It was stratified by provider specialty, drug class, and specific medications, to determine how often these indications were in prescriptions for as-needed (PRN) versus non-PRN medications. RESULTS: During the study period, 4,356,086 prescriptions were ordered. Indications were included in 322,961 orders (7.41%). From these orders, 249,262 indications (77.18%) were written for PRN orders. Although internal medicine prescribers generated the highest number of medication orders, they included indications in only 6.26% of their prescriptions, whereas orthopedic surgery providers had the highest rate of documenting indications (33.41%). Pain was the most common indication, accounting for 30.35% of all documented indications. The drug class with the highest number of sigs-containing indications was narcotic analgesics. Non-PRN chronic medication prescriptions rarely included the indication. CONCLUSION: Prescribers rarely included drug indications in electronic free-text prescription instructions, and, when they did, it was mostly for PRN uses such as pain.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prescripciones de Medicamentos / Sistemas de Entrada de Órdenes Médicas / Atención Ambulatoria Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Health Syst Pharm Asunto de la revista: FARMACIA / HOSPITAIS Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prescripciones de Medicamentos / Sistemas de Entrada de Órdenes Médicas / Atención Ambulatoria Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Health Syst Pharm Asunto de la revista: FARMACIA / HOSPITAIS Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido